Wednesday, January 4, 2017

PROFESSOR JIDEOFO KENECHUKWU DANMBAEZUE CATEGORICALL STATES “HINC ET NUNC” THAT RELIGIO-POLITICAL-MENTAL SLAVERY IS MORE ENDEMIC AND RETROGRESSIVE THAN SIMPLE PHYSICAL SLAVERY!

LIBERATION OF THE AFRICAN RESURRECTS IN KENEZIANISM


Earlier the Great WILLIAM WILBERFORCE championed the Physical Liberation

Presently KENECHUKWU DANMBAEZUE champions the Psychological Liberation



A PROTRACTED PROLOGUE



KENEZIANISM IS THE INTEGRATION OF ALL HUMAN BEINGSON PLANET EARTH INTO THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF
ONE ALMIGHTY CREATOR,
ONE CREATED UNIVERSE
AND THEREFORE ONE HUMAN FMILY
SHARING THE BENEFITS AND BENEVOLENCE OF THE COMMON OMNISCIENT AND OMNIPOTENT DESIGNER, ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, FATHER, MOTHER AND DOCTOR OF THE ENTIRE NATIONS IN EXISTENCE,



NOW OUR AREA OF KENEZ INTEREST IN THIS DISSERTATION

http://creation.com/anti-slavery-activist-william-wilberforce-christian-hero

Anti-slavery activist William Wilberforce: Christian hero

Published: 20 February 2007 (GMT+10)
Image University of Texas Libraries, The University of Texas at Austin
William Wilberforce
William Wilberforce
This year is a historical bicentennial: on 25 March 1807, William Wilberforce’s long fight to end slavery resulted in the royal assent to ‘An Act for the Abolition of the Slave Trade’, which abolished the buying and selling of humans throughout the British Empire. This was after 20 years of struggle and repeated previous defeats of his anti-slavery bills in Parliament.
Even the usually anti-Christian Hollywood is commemorating this historic day with the film Amazing Grace (actually by Walden Media, which also produced the Narnia movie). Amazing Grace stars the Welsh actor Ioan Gruffudd (pronounced ‘Griffith’) of Hornblower fame as Wilberforce, and Albert Finney as his mentor John Newton, the slaver-turned-abolitionist who composed the famous hymn after which the film is named. [Update: see our film review.]
With a plethora of books attacking Christianity, this anniversary is timely in reminding the world of the great good that it has achieved when truly followed. Slavery is one of the best examples—far from being a Western Christian invention, it was ubiquitous, and it was only the Christian west that abolished it. (See also Christianity’s real record (off site), showing that atheists frequently exaggerate atrocities by professing Christians, ignore the great good done by Christians practising their faith, and ignore the far greater atrocities of atheist regimes.)

Slavery throughout history

As conservative black economist Thomas Sowell points out in the Slavery chapter in Black Rednecks and White Liberals, slavery has been around all over the world for most of its history. And for most of this dismal history, it was not a racial issue. Most slaves did not differ racially from their masters.
For example, Europeans enslaved Europeans—indeed, it was a European people group, the Slavs, that was such a common victim of slavers that the very word comes from this group (although in the Slavonic languages, slava means glory). Also, Asians enslaved Asians, and Africans enslaved Africans—black slaves were usually first captured by other blacks because the Europeans were susceptible to African diseases if they ventured into the interior.
And in many cases, Caucasians were enslaved by non-Caucasians: the dark-skinned Muslim Moors enslaved ‘white’ Europeans during their occupation of the Iberian peninsula (what they called ‘al Andalus’) from 711 to 1492.
Later, from the 16th century, the Muslim Barbary States of North Africa encouraged pirates who had a flourishing white slave trade. In the first half of the 17th century, 20,000 captives were said to be imprisoned in Algiers alone. The Europeans paid blood money to these rogue states until US President Thomas Jefferson sent the American Navy to bomb the pirate ships and ports in 1805 (the US Marines’ taking of Tripoli in the Battle of Derne is the inspiration for the phrase ‘to the shores of Tripoli’ in the Marine Hymn).
Tragically, Muslims are still enslaving blacks today in Africa. African-American economist Dr Walter Williams of George Mason University writes in Black Slavery is Alive in 2001:
‘Slavery in the Sudan is in part a result of a 15-year war by the Muslim north against the black Christian and animist south. Arab militias, armed by the Khartoum government, raid villages, mostly those of the Dinka tribe. They shoot the men and enslave the women and children. Women and children are kept as personal property or they’re taken north and auctioned off.
‘American Anti-Slavery Group says, “Most distressing is the silence of the American media whose reports counted for so much in the battle to end apartheid in South Africa.” … In fact, it’s fairly safe to say that most of today’s most flagrant human rights abuses occur in Africa. But unfortunately they get little attention — maybe it’s because Africans instead of Europeans are the perpetrators; Europeans are held accountable to civilized standards of behavior, while Africans aren’t.’

Wilberforce and the anti-slavery society

Wilberforce and his anti-slavery fight were documented in a recent book Bury the Chains: Prophets and Rebels in the Fight to Free an Empire’s Slaves by Adam Hochschild (2005). Dr Sowell summarizes in a review:
‘The anti-slavery movement was spearheaded by people who would today be called “the religious right” and its organization was created by conservative businessmen. Moreover, what destroyed slavery in the non-Western world was Western imperialism.’ ‘Nothing could be more jolting and discordant with the vision of today’s intellectuals than the fact that it was businessmen, devout religious leaders and Western imperialists who together destroyed slavery around the world.’
Indeed, Hochschild documents that the world’s first anti-slavery movement began with a meeting of 12 ‘deeply religious’ men in London in 1787, including Wilberforce.
Wilberforce’s motivations are crystal clear from his own book A Practical View of Christianity (1797). This was a best seller in its time, going through five printings in six months and was translated into five foreign languages. John Piper writes:
‘What made Wilberforce tick was a profound Biblical allegiance to what he called the “peculiar doctrines” of Christianity. These, he said, give rise, in turn, to true affections—what we might call “passion” or “emotions”—for spiritual things, which, in turn, break the power of pride and greed and fear, and then lead to transformed morals which, in turn, lead to the political welfare of the nation. He said, “If … a principle of true Religion [i.e., true Christianity] should … gain ground, there is no estimating the effects on public morals, and the consequent influence on our political welfare.”’
Indeed, some of Wilberforce’s comments could easily have been written to describe today’s times, with a plethora of anti-Christian books, TV, films and laws:
‘The time is fast approaching when Christianity will be almost as openly disavowed in the language as in fact it is already supposed to have disappeared from the conduct of men: when infidelity will be held to be the necessary appendage of a man of fashion, and TO BELIEVE will be deemed the indication of a feeble mind.’
O be not weary of well doing! Go on, in the name of God and in the power of his might, till even American slavery (the vilest that ever saw the sun) shall vanish away before it.—John Wesley’s last letter, commending Wilberforce.
Indeed, Wilberforce had to struggle against not only repeated rejections, but also ill health. He had painful chronic ulcerative colitis (large bowel disease), for which he was prescribed laudanum (a sweetened solution of opium and alcohol), a strong painkiller for the time. It is now usually illegal because it is so addictive, and Wilberforce kicked the habit, but not before it had damaged his eyes. He also had a morose wife who was an unfortunate contrast to his cheerful disposition.
Yet not only did he lead the way to abolish slavery, he also promoted hospitals and prison reform, and advocated positive reform in India and other colonies. He also fought against cruelty to animals, founding what we know today as the ‘Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals’. No wonder he was eventually called the ‘Conscience of Parliament.’
Wilberforce was not always a Christian. Indeed, he was born into the privileged class, and that culture, much like today’s Hollywood, loved gambling, fancy clothes, fast horses, drinking and gluttony. Furthermore, he had denounced the deity of Christ after attending an apostate church much like today’s liberal ones. But in a secular sense, he was succeeding very nicely, entering parliament at 21, and was a good friend of William Pitt the Younger (1759–1806), who would become the UK’s youngest ever Prime Minister at 24.
However, Wilberforce gave his life truly to Christ in 1775, then wanted to quit parliament because of the immorality and infighting. However, he visited John Newton (1725–1807), famous for the great hymn Amazing Grace (hence the name of the film). Newton in his earlier days had been a slave trader himself before his conversion to Christ. Newton was the one who convinced Wilberforce that he would do the most good by remaining in Parliament:
‘It is hoped and believed that the Lord has raised you up for the good of His church and for the good of the nation.’
After Newton’s conversion, he first insisted that slaves were to be treated humanely. But he soon came to see that since the slaves were also created in the image of God, the slave trade was wrong in itself, and could not be humanized. He left the trade, became friends with the great evangelists George Whitfield (1714–1770) and John Wesley (1703–1791) and his brother Charles (1707–1788), became a minister, and testified to King George III (1738–1820) about the atrocities of the slave trade.
Image Wikipedia.org
John Wesley
John Wesley
John Wesley was instrumental in the conversion of Wilberforce himself. And Wesley’s last letter of his life of 24 February 1791 was to Wilberforce commending his abolitionist work, comparing this to the gallant struggle of Athanasius (c. 293–373) for the vital biblical doctrine of the full deity of Christ.
‘Unless the divine power has raised you up to be as Athanasius contra mundum [Athanasius against the world], I see not how you can go through your glorious enterprise in opposing that execrable villainy which is the scandal of religion, of England, and of human nature. Unless God has raised you up for this very thing, you will be worn out by the opposition of men and devils. But if God be for you, who can be against you? Are all of them together stronger than God? O be not weary of well doing! Go on, in the name of God and in the power of his might, till even American slavery (the vilest that ever saw the sun) shall vanish away before it.’
Another prominent anti-slavery activist in Britain was Granville Sharp (1735–1813), who was most responsible for a law that a slave became free from the moment he set foot on English territory, and founded a society for the abolition of slavery. He was also a joint founder of the British and Foreign Bible Society and the Society for the Conversion of the Jews. A noted Greek scholar, he published a detailed and accurate study, discovering a rule of grammar that’s accepted by the majority of Bible translators today and now bears his name. But the existing English translations had overlooked this rule, thus, as he pointed out, they obscured the deity of Christ in places like Titus 2:13 and 2 Peter 1:1, which should say ‘our (great) God and Savior Jesus Christ’.
Another very important activist was Thomas Clarkson (1760–1846), an evangelical Anglican who first became interested in the issue when he was at Cambridge in 1785. That year, he won a Latin essay competition with an essay called Is it lawful to enslave the unconsenting? His detailed research convinced him of the immorality and horrors of slavery. Next year he translated this essay into English under the title ‘An essay on the slavery and commerce of the human species, particularly the African’, translated from a Latin Dissertation. This essay was very influential in the foundation of the Committee for the Abolition of the Slave Trade soon after, in 1787. Also in that year, he wrote the pamphlet: A Summary View of the Slave Trade and of the Probable Consequences of Its Abolition. He was a most courageous opponent, since early that year, he was attacked in Liverpool by a gang of sailors who had been paid to assassinate him, and he barely escaped with his life.

Sequel to anti-slave trade act

The 1807 Act for the Abolition of the Slave Trade didn’t actually abolish slavery, just trading in slaves. So Wilberforce’s campaign was not over. But as it stood, it allowed the British navy to declare slave-transporting ships as equivalent to pirates, and capture them to free the slaves and possibly execute the crew. This would be what Dr Sowell means by ‘Western Imperialism’. It was also an example of ‘imposing one’s morals on others’.
Related to this, the Stephen Spielberg film Amistad (1997), although dramatizing events connected with a real-life slave mutiny on a real ship by that name, accurately portrays a typical British navy officer, Captain Fitzgerald’s utter disgust for slavery. The movie ends with this captain finding the Lomboko Slave Fortress in Sierra Leone, Africa where the slaves had embarked, sending its crew of Royal Marines to capture the fort’s owners and liberate the captives, then blasting it to pieces with the ship’s cannon.
Things have come to a pretty pass when religion is allowed to invade public life.—Pro-slavery Lord Melbourne, in opposition to Wilberforce.
However, even this did not stop the trade, because some captains would throw the slaves overboard if they saw the Navy. This was also portrayed on Amistad, although there is no evidence that it happened on that particular ship. But the ‘Slavery Abolition Act’ was passed in 1833. This made slavery illegal and mandated that slaves would be freed (immediately for children under 6, while those over 6 would be part slave and part free for a further four years and be paid wages).
Fortunately, Wilberforce lived to see this. He had become seriously ill with influenza when on 26 July 1833, he learned with much rejoicing that this act had passed the final reading in the House of Commons. Three days later, he died. One month after that, Parliament passed the act.

Biblical teachings and applications

It should not be too surprising that Wilberforce and his allies should have such a strong Christian commitment. Indeed, the opposition is founded in the Creation account of Genesis. God created a male and female human in His image, and gave humanity dominion over the rest of creation, not over fellow humans (Genesis 1:26–28). And Galatians 3:28 explicitly teaches the foundational equality of human beings in nature.

Does the Bible support slavery?

Every two-penny christophobe ignores the above points, and tries to portray the Bible as advocating slavery. However, they are guilty of gross decontextualising of the Bible, in presuming that the word in the Bible refers to the antebellum American South. In reality, it had a wide range of meanings. E.g. in the biblical culture, the Prime Minister’s cabinet members would be called his ‘slaves’. The New World slavery that most people think of was expressly forbidden in the Bible, because it resulted from kidnapping, and because converted slaves were not freed as per Philemon and Anselm (above). A scholarly apologetics site run by a CMI contributor explains more:
‘Scholars do not agree on a definition of “slavery”. The term has been used at various times for a wide range of institutions, including plantation slavery, forced labor, the drudgery of factories and sweatshops, child labor, semivoluntary prostitution, bride-price marriage, child adoption for payment, and paid-for surrogate motherhood. Somewhere within this range, the literal meaning of “slavery” shifts into metaphorical meaning, but it is not entirely clear at what point. A similar problem arises when we look at other cultures. The reason is that the term “Slavery” is evocative rather than analytical, calling to mind a loose bundle of diagnostic features. …
‘The word ‘ebed [עבד], however, denoted not only actual slaves occupied in production or in the household but also persons in subordinate positions (mainly subordinate with regard to the king and his higher officials). Thus the term ‘ebed is sometimes translated as “servant”. Besides, the term was used as a sign of servility in reference to oneself when addressing persons of higher rank. Finally, the same term was also used in the figurative meaning “the slave (or servant) of God”. Thus, the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, prophets, David, Solomon and other kings are regularly called slaves of Yahweh (Exod 32:13; Lev 25:55; 1 Sam 3:9; Ezra 9:11, etc.). Similarly, all the subjects of Israel and Judah are called slaves of their kings, including even wives, sons, and brothers of the latter (1 Sam 17:8; 29:3; 2 Sam 19:5, etc.; cf. also Gen 27:37; 32:4).…
‘For example, courtiers of an Aramean ruler or the soldiers of the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar II were considered slaves of their monarchs (2 Kgs 6:11; 24:10–11). It is natural that kings of Judah depending on more powerful rulers of neighboring countries were considered their slaves. Thus, Ahaz is referred to as a slave of the Assyrian king Tiglath-pileser III (2 Kgs 16:7). In modern translations of the Bible ‘ebed / doulos [δούλος] and several other similar terms are rendered “slave” as well as “servant”, “attendant”, etc. Such translations, however, might create some confusion and give the incorrect impression that special terms for the designation of servants and slaves are attested in the Bible… ‘However, selecting the proper meaning from such a broad metaphorical application of the term designating a general dependence rarely presents great difficulty. For example, Abimelech, king of Gerar, called up his slaves and told them his dream (Gen 20:8). Apparently, these “slaves” were royal courtiers and officials.’
Then why is there no command in the Bible to free the slaves immediately? Because the commands in the Bible already documented would subtly undermine the institution far better than a slave rebellion. E.g. the prohibition on trading in slaves would drastically localize it. Compare the application of Paul’s teachings with the tragic end to the rebellion of Spartacus (c. 120–70 BC), or in modern times, compare Martin Luther King’s peaceful (and Bible-based) protests with the secular revolutionary Malcolm X.
This is reinforced in the Mosaic Law, which explicitly prohibits kidnapping and selling others into slavery, ‘Whoever steals a man and sells him, and anyone found in possession of him, shall be put to death,’ (Exodus 21:16). And of course, Moses was the man who God used in His miraculous deliverance of the Israelite nation from bondage in Egypt, commemorated in the great Jewish celebration of the Passover.
In the Law of Christ, the Apostle Paul lists ‘slave traders’ / ‘menstealers’ (ανδραποδιστής andrapodistēs) with murderers, adulterers, perverts, liars and other evil people (1 Timothy 1:10). Paul tells slaves to become free, if they can (1 Corinthians 7:21), and conversely tells free people to not become slaves (1 Corinthians 7:23). When it came to a personal example, he encouraged Philemon to free his escaped slave Onesimus (Philemon 16). Furthermore, he ordered masters to treat their slaves in the ‘same way’ as they were treated, and not to threaten them (Eph. 6:9).
Such practice would see the end of slavery, and without bloodshed. This indeed happened, as thoroughly documented in Rodney Stark’s book For the Glory of God: How monotheism led to reformations, science, witch-hunts and the end of slavery (see review, The biblical origins of science). He devoted ch. 4 to the consistent teachings against slavery.
Stark documented that even back in the 7th century, Christians publicly opposed slavery. The bishop and apologist Anselm (c. 1033–1109) forbade enslavement of Christians, and since just about everyone was considered a nominal Christian, this practically ended slavery. Then the famous theologian and apologist Thomas Aquinas (c. 1225–1274) denounced the practice. Several popes supported this from 1435, and Pope Paul III (1468–1549) gave three major pronouncements against slavery in 1537, e.g. Sublimus Dei — On the Enslavement and Evangelization of Indians in the New World. As Stark writes, ‘The problem wasn’t that the [Church] leadership was silent. It was that almost nobody listened.’

Opposition to Wilberforce

Wilberforce’s fight against slavery has much to teach us today, because many of the opposition tactics are very similar to what anti-Christians use today (‘so there is nothing new under the sun’ Ecclesiastes 1:9). There are several categories:

Anti-biblical worldview

As pointed out in Christianity on Trial (see review, Countering Christophobia), pagan philosophers, like Aristotle, regarded some people as natural slaves, and ‘Enlightenment’ philosophers hostile to Christianity such as Hume and Voltaire believed in the inferiority of dark-skinned people. They had no time for the equality of nature taught in the Bible.

‘Keep religion out of politics’

This is probably the most common trap that Christians can fall into today. But Wilberforce faced exactly the same attitudes. For example, William Lamb aka Lord Melbourne (1779–1848), a future Prime Minister of the UK and a mentor of Queen Victoria (and the eponym of Australia’s second city), pontificated: ‘Things have come to a pretty pass when religion is allowed to invade public life.’ Likewise Willoughby Bertie, 4th Earl of Abingdon (1740–1799) spouted, ‘Humanity is a private feeling, not a public principle to act upon’.
Thus pro-abortion politicians who say crude things like ‘Keep your rosaries off my ovaries’ are saying nothing new. But in reality, facile slogans like ‘Don’t like abortions? Don’t have one!’ are as immoral as ‘Don’t like slavery? Don’t own slaves!’

Accusations of hypocrisy

This is a common tactic today. It is one type of (circumstantial1) ad hominem (‘to the person’). It doesn’t refute a position per se, but can discredit its proponents and thus their position by association.
Wilberforce had to face this charge, but it wasn’t in the least bit substantiated (he certainly never owned slaves himself!). Admiral Lord Nelson (1758–1805) showed that although he was a brilliant naval tactician, he was a lousy logician. He wrote from his flagship Victory to blast ‘the damnable doctrine of Wilberforce and his hypocritical allies!’ The Duke of Clarence asserted in the House of Lords that ‘the promoters of the Abolition were either frauds or hypocrites!’ King George III declared that Wilberforce and his allies were ‘hypocrites and not to be trusted!’ (see William Wilberforce— Setting the Captives Free).
The problem wasn’t that the [Church] leadership was silent. It was that almost nobody listened (Rodney Stark)
Today, we often find that Christians are charged with hypocrisy, whether they deserve it or not. However, ‘hypocrisy is the compliment vice pays to virtue’—see The Haggard tragedy: ‘Christianity must be wrong because of all the hypocrites in the church!’ As shown, when some of its leaders fail to live up to their teachings, they cause great harm to themselves and others. Thus even their failings demonstrate how good these teachings would have been if put into practice.
It is a contrast to the blind spot anti-Christians have towards hypocrisy in their own ranks. They often don’t live consistently by their own teachings, but in their case it is a good thing, because the teachings are lousy.
E.g. Peter Singer, the antitheistic ‘ethicist’ who supports infanticide, euthanasia and bestiality, would not have his own mother killed when she developed Alzheimer’s. So his hypocrisy showed how diabolical his theories really are, and it is a good thing for his mother that Peter is a better son than he is an ethicist.
Similarly, the misotheist Richard Dawkins rejects objective right and wrong, but still wants to denounce creationists and pro-lifers as ‘wrong’. And consider those postmodernist academics who claim that language has no objective meaning but is in the eye of the beholder. They would bleat piteously if their university accountant decided not to pay them, on the grounds that he beheld their salary contract as meaning that they would work for free.

Abusive ad hominem

Image Wikipedia.org
Lord Melbourne
Lord Melbourne
Wilberforce’s opponents were not above this type of argument as well. In Wilberforce’s case, attacks would focus on his shortness (he was only 5’ (152 cm) tall). James Boswell (1740–1795), best known for his fascinating biography of Dr Johnson (1709–1784), author of the first English dictionary, wrote the following ‘poem’ (see Remembering a Hero):
I hate your little whittling sneer
Your pert and self-sufficient leer.
Begone, for shame
Thou dwarf with big resounding name.
Misotheists today are not above inflammatory language. A good example is our old friend Dawkins. Tobias Jones in the leftist UK paper The Guardian, in an article Secular fundamentalists are the new totalitarians: Militant secularists like Richard Dawkins are taking their revenge on us believers for refusing to stay in the closet writes:
Believers are ridiculed for being, in contrast to the stupendously brainy atheists, very dim. Listen to Richard Dawkins’ comment on Nadia Eweida (the BA [British Airways] employee who refused to take off her cross [so was suspended]): ‘she had one of the most stupid faces I’ve ever seen.’ Nice.2

Epilogue: American application

The USA abolished slavery only after its Civil War (aka ‘War between the States’) in 1865, although it is an over-simplification to attribute this war to slavery alone. Here it was a case of being slow to realize the implications of the Declaration of Independence which declared:
‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.’
This is mainly because right at the start, many of the states were Slave States. All the same, as Carroll and Shiflett point out in Christianity on Trial, this deduction from Paul’s statement in Galatians 3:28 (above) would have been laughed at in pagan times. It was this declaration that led Lincoln to abolish slavery, citing it in the Gettysburg Address.
However, American slavers likewise realized the contradiction between slavery and the Declaration, so some of them invented schemes by which the black slaves were regarded as less than human. So in reality, it was more a case of slavery causing racism rather than racism causing slavery.
Image Ernst von Hesse-Wartegg, Mississippi-Fahrten [Travels on the lower Mississippi, 1879–1880] (Leipzig, 1881).
Slaves in America often picked cotton
Slaves in America often picked cotton
Indeed, the 1787 US Constitutional Convention originally counted slaves as 3/5 of a person for purposes of deciding representation in the House. Actually, this compromise was to limit the voting power of the Slave States, because otherwise they could have counted the slaves for voting purposes, yet used this voting leverage to vote against these very slaves, which would be real chutzpah. Naturally all this became academic after the abolition of slavery by the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (1865), so the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (1868) counted whole persons regardless of race.
However, while slavery flourished, some of its defenders picked up on biblical compromises, such as the pre-Adamite nonsense, which was a common justification for racism before Darwin. Another was inventing a ‘curse on Ham’ that allegedly resulted in dark skin. However, the Bible is crystal clear that the curse wasn’t even on Ham at all, but on his son Canaan, and by implication, only Canaan’s descendants. There is not the slightest hint in Scripture, whether explicitly or by logical deduction, that they were black, let alone that blackness is the result of any curse (see also Are black people the result of a curse on Ham? from One Blood: The biblical answer to racism).
However, America had a huge number of Christians who wrote and campaigned extensively against slavery (the page Slavery: Early Christian responses in America links to dozens of articles by these Christian abolitionists). There was also the heavily Christian-based novel Uncle Tom’s Cabin (1852), by Harriet Beecher Stowe (1811–1896), widely recognized as a major cause of people in the North turning so strongly against slavery. Abraham Lincoln called her: ‘the little woman who wrote the book that made this great war.’ She also pointed out in another book Woman in Sacred History (1873) that the American slaves themselves used explicit biblical imagery to describe their plight:
It has well been said that nations struggling for liberty against powerful oppressors flee as instinctively to the Old Testament as they do to mountain ranges. The American slave universally called his bondage Egypt, and read the history of the ten plagues and the crossing of the Red Sea as parts of his own experience. In the dark days of slavery, the history of Moses was sung at night, and by stealth, on plantations, with solemn rhythmic movements, reminding one of Egyptian times (p. 63).
It is also noticeable that 100 years later, Martin Luther King Jr. cited overtly biblical justifications for racial equality. And the enemies of racial equality also saw its Christian underpinning, as shown by the KKK bombing of the Sixteenth Street Baptist Church in Birmingham, Alabama, 15 September 1963, which killed four black girls. This shows once more the virulently anti-Christian attitudes held by fanatical racists (see also Darwinism’s influence on modern racists and white supremacist groups: the case of David Duke).
In 1857, the US Supreme Court, under Roger Brooke Taney (1777–1864) ruled in the ‘Dred Scott decision’ that Congress could not outlaw slavery in any territory—this was to be the territory’s ‘right’ after it had become a state. Also, slaves were defined as non-persons, and their descendants could not become citizens.
Later, this was rescinded, but it severely dented the moral authority of the Supreme court. And they haven’t learned either. In 1973, in Roe v. Wade, activist judges led by Harry Blackmun (who ironically had a cameo in Amistad) invented a ‘right to privacy’ supposedly found in the US Constitution, applied this to a woman’s womb, and decided that she has a right to abort her baby for any reason (which must logically include the reason, ‘We don’t want a girl’). In the process, the Court explicitly declared the unborn baby a non-citizen. I am convinced that one day, posterity will look upon Roe v. Wade with as much revulsion as the Dred Scott decision.

Post-script: Wilberforce Jr. v Huxley debate

Wilberforce’s son, Samuel (1805–1873), the Bishop of Oxford, obtained notoriety as an opponent of Darwinism, who was supposedly bested in a debate with Darwin’s bulldog, Thomas Henry Huxley (1825–1895). However, real historians have demolished the usual mythology behind the debate, both the notion that Huxley had demolished him, and that Wilberforce had really asked Huxley whether his ape ancestry was from his grandfather’s or grandmother’s side (see the pro-evolution historian J.R. Lucas, ‘Wilberforce and Huxley: A Legendary Encounter’, The Historical Journal 22:313–330, 1979). This doesn’t stop the antitheistic Australian Skeptics from offering a ‘Wilberforce Award’, but then their scholarship has never been of a particularly high standard, as our debate with them showed.
Also ignored by those who want to paint this debate as bigoted religion v enlightened science, Sam Wilberforce was Professor of both Theology and Mathematics of Oxford, and had reviewed Darwin’s Origin for the Quarterly Review, and Darwin admitted the scientific cogency of that review.
And Sam Wilberforce was fully supportive of his father’s anti-slavery campaign. He made such a strong impression at an anti-slavery meeting in 1841 that he was soon appointed as chaplain to Prince Albert. However, this was a marked contrast to his evolutionist opponent, who followed his mentor Darwin in believing in white supremacy (although paradoxically both disapproved of slavery). Huxley said in Emancipation—Black and White (1865):
‘It may be quite true that some negroes are better than some white men; but no rational man, cognisant of the facts, believes that the average negro is the equal, still less the superior, of the average white man. And, if this be true, it is simply incredible that, when all his disabilities are removed, and our prognathous relative has a fair field and no favour, as well as no oppressor, he will be able to compete successfully with his bigger-brained and smaller-jawed rival, in a contest which is to be carried on by thoughts and not by bites. The highest places in the hierarchy of civilisation will assuredly not be within the reach of our dusky cousins, though it is by no means necessary that they should be restricted to the lowest.’
Strangely enough, Richard Dawkins in The God Delusion cites this sentiment by Huxley. In a typically shoddy display of historical revisionism, Dawkins uses this example of a man who was supposedly enlightened for his time to show how much we have grown in morality today:
‘The whole wave keeps moving, and even the vanguard of an earlier century (T. H. Huxley is the obvious example) would find itself way behind the laggers of a later century.’
In reality, Huxley’s sentiment was a backward step from the previous work of Wm. Wilberforce for racial equality, and was written to oppose the notions of equality current in America on the close of the Civil War.
It is a perfect illustration of the point made by famous Marxist evolutionist Stephen Jay Gould (1941–2005), that racist arguments ‘increased by orders of magnitude following the acceptance of evolutionary theory’. And such ideas reached their horrifying climax 70 years later in Germany, directly inspired by evolutionary theory.

A condensed version of this article was published in the September 2007 issue of Creation magazine.

Related Articles

·             Do creationists hate science?
·             Bible v slavery: response to critics
·             The Bible vs slavery and apartheid

Further Reading

·             Racism Questions and Answers

Related Media

·                      

References

1.           I.e. attacking a person’s circumstances, as opposed to abusive ad hominem, attacking the person’s character, etc. Return to Text
2.           Speaking of anti-Christian hypocrisy, BA claimed that Mrs Eweida’s tiny cross was ‘offensive’ to non-christians, yet they allowed very conspicuous Sikh and Muslim clothing. And she is a Coptic Christian whose cross is very important to her because of persecution in her ancestral land of Egypt. Return to Text
LAST BUS STOP FOR ALL GENUINE TRAVELLERS ON THE GLOBAL PEACE MISSION OF I S M FOR OUR GLOBAL VILLAGE


RENASCENT IGBO RELIGION

 

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Integrational Spiritan Movement is a fellowship built on simple truths of nature as they were designed, created and ordained by the Almighty Creator of the entire universe


THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS SPIRITUAL FELLOWSHIP AND ALL OTHER RELIGIOUS GROUPS IS THAT THERE IS NOTHING HERE THAT IS BUILT ON MYTHOLOGIES, FABLES, LEGENDS, DOGMAS, DOCTRINES, BELIEF SYSTEMS OR REVEALED TRUTHS! 

Integrational Spiritan Movement is a fellowship built on simple truths of nature as they were designed, created and ordained by the Almighty Creator of the entire universe and were and still are observable around humankind in all parts of the world.

The difference between this spiritual fellowship for all mankind irrespective of one’s nationality, philosophy of life, social status, educational achievement or political persuasion and other religious fellowships is that there is nothing here that is built on mythologies, fables, legends, dogmas, doctrines, belief systems or revealed truths! 

Rather, what the founder of this interdisciplinary, inter-ethnic and integrational spiritual fellowship has done is to provide simple facts of nature that unites rather than divides the human race. Every being is a product of nature! It argues that since there is only:

        One created universe, of which we all share its amenities,
        One earth, on which we all stand, walk about, build our physical structures, plant on, harvest from and depend on for our food,
        One atmospheric air that living things breathe from to live,
        One rainfall that provides the water for all plants and animals, 
        One sun and a moon that illuminate the world day and night,
        One anatomy and physiology that ensures our survival death,
        Therefore, there must One Almighty Creator, who is the ultimate designer and engineer responsible all that we can think, say, hear, feel and see! He/she is our Father/Mother and we are all sons and daughters of this Infinite Truth that grants us life! Are we not brothers and sisters, irrespective of our skin colour, facial structures, languages and peculiar child rearing practices? We are surely, equal heirs to this commonwealth of mutually beneficent, compensatory and life-sustaining gifts from the Almighty Truth, the All-knowing Spirit, All-sustaining Father and All-powerful Creator of us all! 

This truth is inter-religious, interdenominational, intercultural, interdisciplinary and finally international! Simple statements of facts like these are incontrovertible, aren’t they? We inter-marry and reproduce healthy babies! 

So, why must we follow demonic leaders, spiritual or temporal, who delude us with their myopic ideas and ethnocentric theories into practising social prejudices that eventually result in fighting and killing of our own brothers and sisters? It is not only puerile and futile but also irrational and psychopathological! Let us seek for a solution! I. S. M. seeks that! 

In summary, whatever merited the first man who was taken up to live with the creator lest he be corrupted by his peers is out modus operandi et modus vivendi;







IF YOU REPLACE OUR LOCAL DEITIES WITH FOREIGN ANGELS, DEVILS AND SAINTS   TELL ME WHERE ARE THE DIFFERENCES THAT CONDEMNS ONE TO PAGANISM? visit

https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxrZW5lemhlYWx0aGtsaW5pa3xneDo2MzA5YWY5NDM0YWEwM2Jm


HERE I REST MY SECRETARY'S PEN FOR NOW. CAN THERE BE A ONE-WORLD RELIGION? *** INSTEAD OF THIS FRATRICIDAL CHRISTIANS versus MUSLIMS verses BOKO HARAM verses ISIS a.k.a. ISLAMIC STATE JIHADISTS ? ? I WONDER CAN MERE MORTALS BE FIGHTING FOR GODS. SURELY A RATIONAL ANSWER IS ALL YOU NEED TO SEE THAT THESE RELIGIO-POLITICAL GROUPS ARE SATANIC, DEMONIC, PSYCHOPATHOLOGICAL AND IRRATIONAL ? ?



THE ENOCHIAN BEATITUDES 

1. Blessed are those who obey all the Natural Laws in creation, For theirs is the Kingdom of God, personally guaranteed by The Almighty Creator of the universe. 

2. Blessed are those who recognise that all human beings are their brothers and sisters, For their portion is the possession of the true Egalitarianism. 

3. Blessed are those who know that we all share the same air, water, blood plasma, sun and moon, For this native insight shall reward them with filial love and care for others. 

4. Blessed are those who realise that we all walk and plant on the same ground, For social justice and the joy of sharing shall be their everlasting benefits. 

5. Blessed are those who wake up early each morning thanking and praising God, For this acknowledgement shall bring them divine blessings and peace of mind. 

6. Blessed are all that recognise that equality at birth is the L.C.M. of human life, For theirs is the philosophic insight that eradicates apartheid and abrogates racism. 

7. Blessed are the wise who know that we return to this human equality at death, For theirs are the social virtues and simple lifestyles it inculcates in all wise people. 

8. Blessed are the genuine proponents and practitioners of true family life, For, through lovely children and happy homes, they shall inherit eternal life. 

9. Blessed are all who train themselves to restrain their thoughts and guard their speech, For they will be respected by and confided in by those who interact with them anywhere. 

10. Blessed are the few who have conquered their appetites for food, drinks and sex, For true happiness based on control of their will power shall be crowns on their heads. 

BLESSED ARE THE TRUE DISCIPLES OF PATRIARCH ENOCH FOR 
• SUCCESSFUL LONG LIVES, 
• GOOD HEALTH IN OLD AGE, &
 • PHYSICAL ASCENSION INTO HEAVEN SHALL BE 
THE ETERNAL PRIZES RESERVED FOR THEM BY GOD!





Inspired by the Holy Spirit and written down at 3.30 a.m. on the 11th of March, later improved on and modified till 9.35 a.m. on 26th July, 2004 by Rev. Prof. J. J. Kenez, D.Sc.




BEWARE OF PROSPERITY GOSPEL PREACHERS



1.1 AN OVERVIEW OF THE SCENARIO
Every Wednesday night of the past decade has been a nightmare for the residents of GRA within a kilometre of thePark Lane Hospital in Enugu Urban. Even those of us living three kilometres away, across the Ekulu River, hardly sleep due to the blaring of super sonic loud speakers reeling off a cacophony of religious songs all through the night. The din is not only nauseating but also fanatical and puerile.

As early as 5.00 p.m. every Wednesday evening, the pilgrims start trooping from the Four Corners of the wind. By 7.00 p.m. a riotous motley of fanatics, mystics, neurotics, schizophrenics, the barren, the widowed, the blind, the deaf, the crippled and the chronic spinsters or bachelors assemble for a "Holy Ghost Fire Night!" The craze for abundance in wealth and/or material things of life mistakenly identified as miracles, easily called "signs and wonders" is the latest fad among worshippers of all religions, as well as, Christians of all denominations. If there is any ecumenism that is non-sectarian today, it is to be found among the less privileged seeking for divine healing, the pauperised Christians seeking easy access to prosperity and increment of their meagre salaries through rapid promotions in the civil service or the private sector of the depressed economy. Birds of different plumage sink their dissimilarities and opposing doctrines if only it would guarantee them spiritual relief and the emotional ecstasy the weekly night vigil provides. All over the country, such religious spectacles have become a recurrent decimal in the theory and practice of Christianity since the advent of the American version of Pentecostalism. It soon found loyal associates and solidarity in the company of Catholic Charismatic Renewal Movement (CCRM), the Evangelic Fellowship of the Anglican Communion (EFAC), the Christian or Scripture Union (CU or SU) and a host of such other syncretic organisations within the Christian Community nation-wide! Over three thousand exotic names of mushroom churches exist today!

The undue craze for signs and wonders: a.k.a. deliverance, healing, exorcism, miracles or divine cures and the proliferation of healers of all descriptions and their healing centres is the eight wonder of the world or even the universe! Miracle seekers troop from one crusade ground to another not minding the travel expenses to and from these centres that often are separated by more than five hundred kilometres! These journeys into the unknown, the unbudgeted-for pilgrimages and their feeding bills further dwindle the lean resources of these paupers! "Don't worry!" they exclaim, "God will always provide!" Some are ready to do "dry" fasting for fourteen days or even longer not minding their poor health status, all in the name of getting divine favours! Most of these fanatical miracle-seekers are not only ignorant and confused but are misguided by their greedy pastors who fleece them all in the name of signs and wonders. These brothers / sisters of ours desperately need counselling, re-education and redemption from their hypnotised mental status and the indoctrination of their fake prosperity preaching pastors.

Jesus, our Lord and Master, was not born into a wealthy family or an upper social class nor did he envy those who were! Do you remember the rich young man he asked to "Go sell all you have and come follow me"? The righteous youth left dejected! Moreover, Jesus went further by commenting on how more difficult it would be for the rich to enter the kingdom, stating that it would be easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle! Read the gospels of Matthew 19: vv. 16 - 30, Mark 10: vv. 17 - 30 and Luke 18: 18 - 30. Do not read this booklet any further without doing so! You will be glad you did!

There must be some demonic mass hysteria or occult hypnotism or juju powers involved in today's craze for prosperity among Christians who will do anything abominable to be rich and comfortable! This is the diabolical reason why most greedy pastors and healers would go to native doctors, worship any idol and perform any rituals in search of demonic powers to demonstrate signs and wonders! Some use magical handkerchiefs, others a wave of the hand and yet some blow some air in the direction of their victims who fall down mimicking prostration under the power of the Holy Spirit! This is what this book sets out to unravel. Then, an attempt will be made to straighten out the false indoctrination that has for long kept the congregation hypnotised by this new brand of healers who drive limousines whereas their flock trek the crusade grounds and the very streets of the cities they have converted into their financial empires!

All manners of publicity gimmick, subliminal advertising tricks, blatant trade and cut-throat commerce are now employed by our psychedelic nouveau-riche crusade preachers to ‘fleece the flock and pay the ladies'! Many now make wild claims to signs and wonders performed ‘in the name of Jesus' often tagged deliverance, healing, exorcism and miracles. Money change hands after such magical demonstrations!

Jesus forewarned us of such fake miracle workers! "Freely have you received, so give freely" he cautioned his disciples! We must be wary or else get deceived by these sons and daughters of Satan who parade as miracle workers. We need to remind ourselves of what Our Lord Jesus said about most of these fake workers of signs and wonders! "I do not know you" he said he would tell them at the judgement day when they would try to prove their loyalty by asserting that they cured, healed and cast out demons in his name!

This time around, we want to expose the tricks and falsehood in so many pretences at or spurious claims to exorcism, deliverance or healing! Read THE BOOK OF JEREMIAH, Chapters 23 & 24, and you will see that false claims to speaking on behalf of God had always been there. God hates any fake prophet, priest or pastor who deceives his people! Verse 11 of Chapter 23 sums up God's verdict:

v.11:  The Lord says, "The prophets and the priests are godless;
I have caught them doing evil in the Temple itself.
v.12:  The paths they follow will be slippery and dark;
I will make them stumble and fall. I am going to bring disaster on them; the time of their punishment is coming.
I, the Lord have spoken

Read all the way down, and take note of very interesting verses e.g.

v. 31:  Listen to what I, the Lord, say! I am against the prophets who tell their dreams that are full of lies. They tell these dreams and lead my people astray and their boasting I did not send them or order them to go, and they are of no help at all to the people. I, the Lord have spoken."
I have nothing to add to those Old Testament prophecies, except that I will unmask these false preachers within the confines of this short conference paper. This resume is actually only an appetiser to the main course meal, "SANCTION ALL PROSPERITY GOSPEL PREACHERS" a 250-page book, that you can purchase outside this hall now! ‘Bon apetit!'

1.2 DIVINE HEALERS CHARGE NO FEES
It will be most rewarding for miracle seekers and their equally false and avaricious healers who see it as a money - spinning exercise to refresh their minds with the life and times of two Old Testament prophets; Elijah and Elisha. You should read in detail all the miracles they performed and list out for yourselves how many were paid for! Most prosperity preachers flaunt their ability to hypnotise their listeners with charms they got from juju-doctors and seek material rewards for their abracadabra. However, they need be reminded that genuine healers never ask for any rewards at all!

I will reproduce here only "THE HEALING OF A GENERAL OF THE SYRIAN ARMY" from my favourite Good News Bible edition (GNB) for its clarity of thought, for those who are not conversant with the Christian Bible and for our discussion to be not only meaningful but objective and persuasive! Read the whole contents of 2nd Kings 5:
"Naaman Is Cured
v.1:  Naaman, the commander of the Syrian army, was highly respected and esteemed by the king of Syria, because through Naaman the Lord had given victory to the Syrian forces. He was a great soldier, but he suffered from a dreaded-skin disease.
v.2:  In one of their raids against Israel, the Syrians had carried off a little Israelite girl, who became a servant of Naaman's wife.
v.3:  One day she said to her mistress, Ï wish that my master could go to the prophet who lives in Samaria! He could cure him of his disease."
v.4:  When Naaman heard of this, he went to the King and told him what the girl had said.

v.5:  The king said, "Go to the king of Israel and take this letter to him." So Naaman set out, taking thirty thousand pieces of silver, six thousand pieces of gold, and ten changes of fine clothes.
v.6:  The letter that he took read: "This letter will introduce my officer Naaman. I want you to cure him of his disease."
v.7:  When the king of Israel read the letter, he tore his clothes in dismay and exclaimed, "How can the king of Syriaexpect me to cure this man? Does he think that I am God, with the power of life and death? It is a plain that he is trying to start a quarrel with me!"
v.8:  When the prophet Elisha heard what had happened, he sent word to the king: "Why are you so upset? Send the man to me, and I'll show him that there is a prophet in Israel!"
v.9:  So Naaman went with his horses and chariot, and stopped at the entrance to Elisha's house.
v. 10:  Elisha sent a servant out to tell him to go and wash himself seven times in the River Jordan, and he would be completely cured of his disease.
v.11:  But Naaman left in a rage, saying, "I thought that he would at least come out to me, pray to the LORD his God, wave his hand over the diseased spot, and cure me!
v.12:  Besides, aren't the rivers Abana and Pharpar, back in Damascus, better than any river in Israel? I could have washed in them and been cured!"
v.13:  His servants went up to him and said, "Sir, if the prophet had told you to do something difficult, you would have done it, Now why can't you just wash yourself, as he said, and be cured"
v.14:  So Naaman went down to the Jordan, dipped himself in it seven times, as Elisha had instructed, and he was completely cured. His flesh became firm and healthy, like that of a child.
v.15:  He returned to Elisha with all his men and said, "Now I know that there is no god but the God of Israel; so please, sir, accept a gift from me."
v.16:  Elisha answered, "By the living Lord, whom I serve, I swear that I will not accept a gift." Naaman insisted that he accepts it, but he would not.
v.17:  So Naaman said, "If you won't accept my gift, then let me have two mule-loads of earth to take home with me, because from now on I will not offer sacrifices or burnt-offerings to any god except the LORD.
v.18:  So I hope that the Lord will forgive me when I accompany my king to thetemple of Rimmon, the god of Syria, and worship him. Surely, the LORD will forgive me!
v.19: "Go in peace," Elisha said. And Naaman left.
v.20:  He had gone only a short distance when Elisha's servant Gehazi said to himself, "My master has let Naaman get away without paying a thing! He should have accepted what that Syrian offered him. By the living LORD, I will run after him and get something from him."
v.21:  So he set off after Naaman. When Naaman saw a man running after him, he got down from his chariot to meet him, and asked, "Is something wrong?"
v.22:  "No," Gehazi answered. "But my master sent me to tell you that just now two members of the group of prophets in the hill-country of Ephraim arrived, and he would like you to give them three thousand pieces of silver and two changes of fine clothes."
v.23:  "Please take six thousand pieces of silver," Naaman replied. He insisted on it, tied up the silver in two bags, gave them and two changes of fine clothes to two of his servants, and sent them on ahead of Gehazi.
v.24:  When they reached the hill where Elisha lived, Gehazi took the two bags and carried them into the house. Then he sent Naaman's servants back.
v.25:  He went back into the house, and Elisha asked him, "Where have you been?" "Oh, nowhere, sir, " he answered.
v.26:  But Elisha said, "Wasn't I there in the spirit when the man got out of his chariot to meet you? This is no time to accept money and clothes, olive-groves and vineyards, sheep and cattle, or servants!
v.27:  And now Naaman's disease will come upon you and your descendants will have it for ever!"  When Gehazi left, he had the disease-his skin was as white as snow."
All quotations in this Discourse are from "Good News Bible", or NIV, just like this one:
Isa 1:18
18 "Come now, let us reason together," says the LORD.
"Though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red as crimson, they shall be like wool.
(That is the end of the story)

COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSES OF WHAT TRANSPIRED:

1.       Like all earthly kings, the Syrian king thought it was the king of Israel who should have all the powers! To date, megalomania is and will remain the foolhardiness of those in positions of authority, be they traditional rulers, governors, presidents, pastors, priests or bishops.

2.       The king of Israel gave a worldly meaning to the letter. Since he was afraid of the all-conquering king, he translated the letter correspondingly. If only he had been spiritual and humble, he should have known that a great prophet of the God of his nation lived nearby. However, no, that was not government business. Elisha was not an important dignitary worthy of note in his kingdom. It is the same today. Most temporal authorities never recognise their spiritual counterparts because they know that they can always buy their services! Our religious men must be above board to earn the respect of our civil leaders, just as Elisha refused the material gifts that Naaman tried to give him in appreciation. How many of our present religious men and women would be resolute as Elisha was?

3.       Read verses 12 & 13 now and the truth is clear! These temporal rulers expect royal receptions by religious ones, while the reverse is always the case when it is their turn to receive you at their army headquarters or government houses. Well, the ball is in our court to sweep our house clean by dismissing bootlickers among the vainglory-seeking pastors of our generation.

4.       Now re-read verse 10 and appreciate the simple manner great prophets deal with people of all classes. They do not discriminate nor do they give preferential treatments; v. 10: Elisha sent a servant out to tell him to go and wash himself seven times in the River Jordan, and he would be completely cured of his disease.  You have to earn respect by recognising that you are serving the King of Kings, and therefore pay little or no attention to earthly ranks and social statuses!
5.       Note again, how pride and social status consciousness often make us lose our reasoning capabilities! Read verses 11 - 14. Can you see that ordinary servants and may be, in this case soldiers of lower ranks were more intelligent than a G.O.C. Remember that Field Marshall Naaman was commanding the entire armed forces of Syria. Our archbishops, bishops, superintendents or overseers of the various denominations in today's Christendom can gain some wisdom therefrom. You must, occasionally, humble yourself and accept good counsel from your juniors. Your rank or position does not equate to intelligence! Wisdom is a divine gift!

6.       How many religious leaders of this avaricious generation could refuse the material gifts as Prophet Elisha did? The genuine answer is NO ONE! No, not even the author of this very book! "WHY?" you may ask. We are products of a society that places undue premium on material possessions; flashy cars, colourful robes and public adulation! Re-read verses 15 & 16 and appreciate the very words of "the man of God", but today we have those who like to be addressed as men of God without the attributes associated with the appellation!

7.       Note the complete conversion of the heathen Naaman, and his pleading in advance that the Lord forgives him whenever he had to accompany his king to the temple and bow along to his nation's idol! That is the mark of a good soldier; a demonstration of strict discipline and unflinching loyalty to civil authority despite religious differences with others! Were it in our generation, there would have been a "coup de état" and a spurious litany of reasons to justify the change of guards! This would normally be followed by lengthy congratulatory messages in the electronic media and paid advertorials in all the national dailies! All these fanfares were strictly prohibited by genuine prophets and Jesus Christ himself!

8.       Verses 20 & 21 depict the thinking of our generation of current prosperity preachers! Then take note of the premeditated lies that our nouveau-riche religious assistants can equally forge! Verses 22 & 25 represent what goes on in many churches today. There seems to be a rat race for money and whatever money can buy! Accountants and financials secretaries on many religious committees collude to siphon mission funds atimes with pastors or priests as accomplices! These disciples of Satan have invaded our congregations and traditional honesty in Igboland, as well as, family integrity has become old-fashioned! Ha-ba, Christianity!

9.       Then comes the grand finale of this theosophical homily as is embedded in this auspicious story:"TRANSFERENCE OF THE LEPROSY" which I think is the lesson of the whole eventful narrative. Our priest and pastors should learn from what happened to the greedy and lie-spinning servant of the man of God - Gehazi. I, however, do not share the punishment extended to his innocent children and subsequently their entire posterity! The lesson should however not be lost by us, namely, that our actions as parents may inflict generational curses on our offspring even today! Permit me to sign off on this note!
         If you have access to the "Gift & Award Edition of NEW LIVING TRANSLATION" you will notice that it gives verses 20 - 27 a separate sub-heading that says it all: "THE GREED OF GEHAZI". This truly brings out the lesson of the story. Some greedy healers should realise that often they take on the infirmities they pretend to have chased away from those who paid them for the healing.



         BEWARE ; 

GOD'S GIFTS ARE NOT SALE!


Posted 5th February 2011 by 





2 comments:

1.               
001 FOUNDATION BLOCKS OF INTEGRATIONAL SPIRITAN MOVEMENT

CHAPTER 1: AN OVERVIEW

i. Oh! Mortal man, why do you pride yourself with such titles as " Homo sapiens", "His or Her Excellency", "His Lordship or His Grace", His Royal Highness" and finally the "Lord of the Material Universe", when you can never hear better than a common bat, nor see better than the eagle?
ii. What achievement has any man made that is not built on what has already been provided by Nature? Just name one. Is it not enough to humble us down to our knees in respect to whatever put us here on planet earth?
iii. What is it that took care of our forefathers and ensured that they survived to rear us the best they could? Who protected us in our mothers' wombs and those deadly infant diseases that killed some of our peers so that we survived to flaunt our high resounding titles.
iv. Now let us all bow our heads. Be silent for a while and listen to Nature communicate wisdom in its simplest forms. When you hear the cock that crows at night, starting from about
3.00am till it is 6.00 a.m. marking out the hours while you sleep, what is it saying? -- It is thanking its Creator for another day. And secondly, it is obeying Him by doing its duty twenty-four hours a day marking out the hours of each day for all other animals and you, man, the lord of the material universe as you choose to call yourself!
v. It does it regularly and has been doing so before you, oh little creature copied him to make your wristwatches in an attempt to supplant him, but you have failed. The cock is more precise than the best chronometer you ever invented or will soon manufacture! For one thing, it does not need a battery to operate nor does it need servicing!
From Your One & Only ...........
REVOLUTIONARY PROFESSOR OF MODERN THEOSOPHY
2.
vi. So man, learn to imitate the birds that wake each morning chirping their morning prayers of thanks, while pleading to the Lord for their daily bread.
vii. What of trees that daily release oxygen for your use? Have you ever gone to the gas station to purchase human fuel, either air or water? How much air and water do you use each hour of your life? Who provides and purifies them?
viii. Did you thank the Creator of this universe for these two items only? When will you do so? Do it now! Stop at this page, kneel down and reverence whatever put you here on planet Earth
ix. From today when the birds start their own morning hymns, oh you little man, join them. That is why He feeds them on a daily basis, but you have to struggle and suffer or steal to have food on an irregular basis besides our human greed that makes it difficult for his fellow men to even have a little!
x. Whatever or whoever created us all must have put some laws to govern whatever breathes his air and drinks his water, for there are accidents and suffocation when these elementary functions are performed inappropriately.
xi. We must eat to live, drink to survive, sleep to rest and procreate to save our species from extinction. Each of these functions we perform from generation to generation, educated or not, civilised or not pious or crooked! It wonderful isn't it.
xii. Order and grace, beauty and serenity adorn His creations wherever you find them in their natural habitats unperturbed by the most destructive animal; man! So let us relent!
xiii. The voice of wisdom speaks in all His creations but only the wise can hear them! Can you interpret the language of honeybees or bring fellow men to march in formation like the soldier ants without coercion and spending some funds on training programmes, which the ants never do even at birth!
xiv. These and similar precision occurrences like sunrise and sunset should make us more pious and respectful but what do we find? Arrogance or buffoonery intoxicates most of us.
xv. The wisdom of the Creator shines forth everyday as the sunlight, but we prefer to walk around like blind men vaunting our ignorance of His natural laws that govern our very existence.
xvi. So how do you assist a blind that does not see properly but claims that he is okay and is not in need of your help, as he will never accept that he does not know everything!
xvii. That is the problem with our human race. Other animals are ready to learn from their parents and obey them diligently, only man claims to know when he does not! When shall we ever learn as other baby animals learn?
xviii. The time is now, not tomorrow, not next month, not next year but this very moment. How does one do exactly that, you may ask?
xix. Don't ask me, Kenez; rather ask King Solomon, the Wise! Go and read and memorise 1st Kings, Chapter 3, verses 6-15. Or for an elaborate treatise, find the complete bible edition and read chapter 9 verses 1- 18 of the WISDOM OF SOLOMON.

2.                 


THE MISSION STATEMENT OF INTEGRATIONAL SPIRITAN MOVEMENT
To rescue humanity from the demonic stranglehold of idolatry that now predominates worldwide, you are invited to reason along with us and see that we provide an everlasting cure for sensual lust for food, wine, sex, wealth and power that are the trademarks of society heading for damnation! Are you going to sit on the fence and wait for another failed experiment in Messiahship that was riddled with myopic and ethnocentric bias? Who knows the Creator well enough to declare that he has ‘a chosen people’? Where is the evidence that Moses actually led the so-called people out of any oppressive regime? The history books and modern encyclopaedia did not record the enslavement of the Jewish race except as ‘they were believed as revealed truths’.
THIS IS THE MAJOR OBJECTIVE OF OUR CONSORTIUM OF SOCIAL SCIENTISITS ( I S M  INTEGRATIONAL SPIRITAN MOVEMENT ) THAT HAS VOWED TO ENTHRONE A LASTING GLOBAL PEACE IN OUR DIGITALISED GLOBAL VILLAGE,  PLEASE JOIN US TODAY!

An Intro To Renascent Igbo Religion
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
SUGGESTED PAGESODAY II TH NOVEMBER  2016
News Feed
INTEGRATIONAL SPIRITAN MOVEMENT
To rescue humanity from the demonic stranglehold of idolatry that now predominates worldwide, you are invited to reason along with us and see that we provide an everlasting cure for sensual lust for food, wine, sex, wealth and power that are the trademarks of society heading for damnation! Are you going to sit on the fence and wait for another failed experiment in Messiahship that was riddled with myopic and ethnocentric bias? Who knows the Creator well enough to declare that he has ‘a chosen people’? Where is the evidence that Moses actually led the so-called people out of any oppressive regime? The history books and modern encyclopaedia did not record the enslavement of the Jewish race except as ‘they were believed as revealed truths’.

THIS IS THE MAJOR OBJECTIVE OF OUR CONSORTIUM OF SOCIAL SCIENTISITS ( I S M  INTEGRATIONAL SPIRITAN MOVEMENT ) THAT HAS VOWED TO ENTHRONE A LASTING GLOBAL PEACE IN OUR DIGITALISED GLOBAL VILLAGE,  PLEASE JOIN US TODAY!



ALL MY LIFE I HAVE SPENT THINKING OF HOW TO HALT RELIGIOUS FANATICISM, I, DR JIDEOFO KENECHUKWU DANMBAEZUE, D.Sc. IN MODERN THEOSOPHY, HAS STUDIED RELIGION ACADEMICALLY FROM 1962 AS A JUNIOR SEMINARIAN AT ALL HALLOWS SEMINARY, ONITSHA TO BIGARD MEMORIAL MAJOR SEMINARY 1970 PLUS 35 MORE YEARS POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH  TILL TODAY II th NOVEMBER  2016





DR JIDEOFO KENECHUKWU DANMBAEZUE, D.Sc. IN MODERN THEOSOPHY, HAS STUDIED RELIGION ACADEMICALLY FROM 1962 AS A JUNIOR SEMINARIAN AT ALL HALLOWS SEMINARY, ONITSHA .. THRO ....TO BIGARD MEMORIAL MAJOR SEMINARY AT ENUGU AFTER MY BIAFRAN UNDER-AGED COMMANDO ESCAPADES AS A BUSH COMMISSIONED MAJOR ... BEFORE I THREW IN MY INNOCENT BUT DIRTY TOWEL OF ROMAN CATHOLIC ECCLESIASTICAL CLERICAL AMBITION IN 1970,! THEN CONCENTRATED ON UNRAVELING THE ETIOLOGICAL GENESIS OF RELIGIOUS FANATICISM AS AN ACADEMIC TILL 2009,.. SINCE THEN TO DATE.... 11 th NOVEMBER 2016 ....................................................................
And behold what I found out;
Danmbaezue Jideofo Kenechukwu25 November 2014 17:28
Religion, which is superstition sanctioned by the state, is actually an addiction to man-made doctrines and dogmas invented, patented and copyrighted by a few demagogues.
• It enslaves the mind more than psychoactive drugs,
• Benumbs human creativity and resourcefulness thereby
• Restricting the development of the human potential and capital.
It is the main cause of poverty of the mind and underdevelopment of third world countries as its side-effects are indolence, redundancy, laziness and dependence of finished products and services. In the final analysis, it is the predisposing factor to lack of initiative, debilitating ignorance, fetish belief-systems, abject poverty and perennial ill-health.
Perhaps its only advantage is that it makes the polity docile and amenable to the whims and caprices of their oppressive leaders. Often, it hoodwinks its adherents into believing that ‘The God’ or ‘the gods’ they worship speak to them through the voices of their egocentric clerics who therefore can conveniently exploit them to satisfy their demonic desires of sensual pleasure and inordinate ambitions of amassing wealth. Their wanton indulgence in gluttony, wine and women is seen in every action and definitely this is the foolproof evidence of their demonic genealogy.
To rescue humanity from the demonic stranglehold of idolatry that now predominates worldwide, you are invited to reason along with us and see that we provide an everlasting cure for sensual lust for food, wine, sex, wealth and power that are the trademarks of society heading for damnation! Are you going to sit on the fence and wait for another failed experiment in Messiahship that was riddled with myopic and ethnocentric bias? Who knows the Creator well enough to declare that he has ‘a chosen people’? Where is the evidence that Moses actually led the so-called people out of any oppressive regime? The history books and modern encyclopaedia did not record the enslavement of the Jewish race except as ‘they were believed as revealed truths’.
Danmbaezue Jideofo Kenechukwu25 November 2014 17:30
The Creator has hidden so much from our intellectual faculties that to date we are still unravelling those He is allowing humanity to glimpse at through divine dreams, intuitions, inspirations and revelations to devout souls! Do you want to have supernatural knowledge mediated by spiritual faculties of seeing, feeling, sensing and caring for others? Look inwards, for the kingdom of God is inside you, not outside as many preachers tell you. No one ever got eternal bliss by keeping the commandments of men. It is given to altruistic seekers of that Divine Guidance in the affairs of mankind, which many yearn for but do not know where, when and how to find it. Search for it in this book!
The creator gave humans some of his powers and knowledge for recreating the material universe for the mutual benefits of all his created beings but today many use his gifts to perpetrate evil. Either by design or demonic manipulation, the obverse is the case; the first datum that every living thing recognises is that someone put it here and caters for its welfare. Dogs respect and fight in defence of their owners. Every pet realises that it is loved and taken care of by someone who has value for its existence. It is human who pride themselves of being rational beings that do not recognise, respect or realise that all of us have a single owner. It is absurd! Some believe there is an Almighty Creator who provides for each creature on daily basis, some assert that he has turned his back on us due to our congenital wickedness and cruel ways, while others simply deny his existence!
This is my summation of the problem; “Religion was/is a superstitious search by humanity for its origin, existence, meaning and relevance before the scientific era. The search was led by acclaimed sages among the elders of a community who defined its theories and practices. It is later ratified and recommended for legislation and implementation by state apparatus by convincing stratagem or coercion by politico-religious leaders. Thereafter, it is fine tuned and administered by ordained priests and priestesses who hand it down along ancestral lineages from one generation of lukewarm adherents, fanatics and mystics to another. Gradually, strong personalities emerge claiming divine appointment and so pull strong followers who idolise them as role models with supernatural powers. This obsession confirms them as beacons of adulation and finally leads to full scale idolatry.
Danmbaezue Jideofo Kenechukwu25 November 2014 17:32
INTRODUCTION TO INTEGRATIONAL SPIRITAN MOVEMENT
The Computer-Age Spiritual Fellowship for Citizens of Our Global Village
Many people are mere conformists. They are those personalities that are satisfied with ‘going through the motions’; doing what everyone else is doing to make a living and waiting for the final ‘call to glory’ as they brand death! Many of us are born and live an inconsequential life; bland, uneventful and without anything particular to be remembered for after our exit from this mundane world, a temporal habitation for the soul. There are some others, whose lives and contributions to the society made a difference! They changed the ‘status quo’ by either extending the frontiers of knowledge or developing their immediate communities. They improved the understanding of human nature and taught others the values of humanitarianism. These heroes and heroines touched the lives of many both inter-racially and internationally.
They added colour to the doldrums of routine existence on planet earth!
A few had tall dreams and went ahead to transform them into reality despite all odds. This group devised methods of changing the deplorable situations and the deprived circumstances of the lifestyle they met on becoming adults. Some adolescents dream of the courage to better their social status, but often take off on the wrong foot of seeking for titles, money, fame and crowning it all with indulging in romantic relationships.
Others dared to pursue the unknown, to break new grounds and blaze trails for followers to tread on. Their zeal, inquisitiveness, passion, persistence, desire, motivations and prayers were fully rewarded if they paid the prize for success; optimism, dedication and the refusal to quit. Their philosophy of life was ‘When the task gets tough, the tough get it going!’, ‘Never say, never again!’ or ‘All that it takes to make the impossible possible is the power to remove the ‘im’ in front of the possible!’
They eventually became geniuses, inventors, explorers, leaders or discoverers! They evolved into the innovators and pioneers who helped to enlarge the frontiers of human civilisations and removed the age-old boundaries of the unknown. Joining this select group of animators or league of achievers is usually not by accident or by mere wishful thinking. Beyond desire and hard work is a divine factor that must be recognised, respected and appropriated in unveiling the unknown that the Divine Architect had hidden there for ages waiting for a brave soul to convert it from obscure dormancy to utilitarian vibrancy. This author, Dr Kenez wants to know where you belong in this universal continuum. Or, are you waiting for ‘manna from heaven’?
...........................................................................................................
RELIGIOUS FANATICISM NEEDS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A DEBILITATING ILLNESS OF DEPERSONALISATION ORIGIN BY DSM III, BECAUSE IT IS WORSE THAN CHRONIC ALCOHOLISM OR GENETICALLY INHERITED SEXUAL PROMISCUITY, AS WELL AS ALL VERSIONS OF NYMPHOMANICAL ADDICTIONS
PROFESSOR JIDEOFO KENECHUKWU DANMBAEZUE EMPHATICALLY SAYS THAT RELIGIOUS FANATICISM NEEDS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A DEBILITATING ILLNESS AND TREATED BY UNITED NATIONS ORGANISATIONS; WHO. UNICEF , UNESCO etc etc AS A PREDISPOSING FACTOR IN LEADING CURRENT RELIGIOUS FANATICS BENT ON LEADING THE CIVILISED WORLD TO THE THIRD WORLD WAR AS NOSTRADAMUS, THE JEWISH-BORN FRENCH PHYSICIAN TURNED INTO 'SEAR' OR ACCURATE PROPHET PREDICTED CENTURIES AGO.
............................................................................................................
; RELIGIOUS FANATICISM HAS NEVER BEEN INCLUDED IN ANY DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL AS AN ILLNESS
We are in the Internet age and in our scientific global village, we do not need armchair philosophers any more. They have done us enough damage.
FANATICISM IS A PSYCHIATRIC ILLNESS AND SO IS MYSTICISM AS BOTH CONSTITUTE THE TWO SIDES OF A COIN NAMELY EXCESSIVE INDULGENCE IN RELIGION
I had the singular opportunity of critically studying religious excesses from 1980 – 1982 at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin, Nigeria as it was the topic I chose and researched on as my M.Sc. dissertation in Mental Health.
I was forced to develop a brand new paper-and-pencil psychological test as there was none in existence as at the material time the Guyana Mass Religious Suicide occurred in Jonestown. Just type Jonestown Mass Suicide into your favourite search engine in the Internet now and read about Rev. Jones and his congregation of more than 900 than drank poison.
Jonestown Mass Suicide
The dead bodies of members of the People’s
Temple Commune lie before the “throne” of the cult’s leader, Jim Jones, in Jonestown, Guyana. Acting on Jones’s orders, more than 900 cult members committed suicide at the Jonestown commune in 1978 by consuming a cyanide-laced soft drink. The quotation on the wall is from American philosopher George Santayana.
Corbis
Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2009. © 1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
It shocked the world for three years, but did it stop people from becoming fanatics, NO, it did not.
And so, to date, Karl Marx; RELIGION IS THE OPIUM OF THE MASSES, remains a true dictum by a non-medical person that depicts how addictive religion can really be.
“Karl Marx, who believed history was driven by purely material considerations, took a dim view of religious faith, calling it “the opium of the masses” in his writings. The Soviet regime’s Marxist roots and its antipathy toward all social associations and belief systems not under its direct control made it openly opposed to religion from the outset. Shortly after 1917 it impounded the property of the Russian Orthodox Church, forbade religious instruction, instituted antireligious propaganda, and persecuted priests. Atheistic fervor, having abated in the 1920s, reached a crescendo after 1929, when thousands of churches were shut down and razed, only to ebb in the late 1930s and to yield during World War II to pragmatic concessions to believers. The crusade against religion was revived by Khrushchev, then toned down under Brezhnev and Gorbachev.
Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2009. © 1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation.
Bertrand Russell, a renowned British philosopher who pioneered STRAIGHT & CROOKED THINKING argued that 2 plus 2 is 4; a fact in mathematics accepted by all and no one quarrels about it because it is FACT but if or when you force people to agree 2 plus 2 is 5, it ceases to be a FACT, it becomes faith and ends as a problem.
The most savage controversies are those about matters as to which there is no good evidence either way.
There's a Bible on that shelf there. But I keep it next to Voltaire—poison and antidote.
I say quite deliberately that the Christian religion, as organized in its Churches, has been and still is the principle enemy of moral progress in the world.
Bertrand Russell (1872 - 1970)
British philosopher and mathematician.
Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2009. © 1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Dr Kenez traced its aetiological roots more psycho-philosophically when he stated in his M.Sc. dissertation of 1982; BELIEF ONLY BECOMES NECESSARY WHEN THERE ARE NO LOGICAL FACTS or EVIDENT PROOFS of a FABRICATED LIE or FALSE THEORY propounded by a demagogue, so it naturally transforms into A DOCTRINE or a DOGMA. That is the beginning of dissension and the remote genesis of any brand of FANATICISM or MYSTICISM.
In the mathematical analyses preceding a concise formula to develop the required PAPER-&-PENCIL TEST after twelve months of psychometric somersaults, real painful academic rigmaroles or the needed scientific jingoism; his proposed this simplified one; FANATICISM results when STRONG WILL pathologically combines with NARROW-MINDEDNESS …. And as a corollary of the flipside of the coin; MYSTICISM only results when a WEAK WILL pathologically combines with same NARROW-MINDEDNES.
rf = sw(nm) whereas rm = ww(nm)
Therefore “ f “ is a factor that could stand for any other human disposition that is addictive; Politics, Football, Religion or Music
This psychometric formula is copyrighted. Do not use it for any other purpose except academic and always acknowledge the originator; - Danmbaezue J. K. (1982) Fanaticism Scale Formula
Go ahead to these websites and read more on mundane religions



An authoritative formulation of the beliefs of a religious community (or, by transference, of individuals). The terms “creed” and “confession of faith” are sometimes used interchangeably,...
BRITANNICA.COM
Top of Form



Like


 
Love


Haha

Wow

Sad

Angry
Comments
Jude Danmbaezue
Jude Danmbaezue 55 YEARS AFTRTROWING IN MY TOWEL, SEE WHAT I HAD EXCHANGED THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DECEPTIVE HOOD OR WHITE SOUTANE FOR,..***.. FULL IGBO ROYALTY REGALIA..!!!

Jude Danmbaezue's photo.
Like · Reply · 6 hrs

THE TRUTH BEHIND
THE JONESTOWN MASSACRE
On November 18, 1978, 913 people died in Jonestown, a small compound carved out of the jungles of Guyana, a small country on the northeast coast of South America. The media at the time reported that it was a fanatical group of followers of the Rev. Jim Jones, lead to the jungles of South America to get away from the oppression of life here in America. They also reported that his followers willingly followed their leader into the great beyond by sipping on some cyanide cocktails, flavored with purple Kool-Aid. In fact, the notion of a mass suicide at Jonestown has been repeated so many times that it is accepted as fact, and the association is so strong that when most people hear "Jonestown," the first thing which pops in their head is "Kool-Aid." This association is false.
http://nstarzone.com/jones.gifhttp://nstarzone.com/jtown.jpg
WHAT THE MEDIA WON'T TELL YOU: JIM JONES WAS A CIA OPERATIVE CONDUCTING MIND CONTROL EXPERIMENTS
The source of the "Kool-Aid Suicide" stories was the U.S. State Department, which presented the story immediately after the "suicides" were reported as though it was the only obvious truth. A U.S. Army spokesman pronounced with complete authority, "No autopsies are needed. The cause of death is not an issue here." The bodies were then allowed to rot in the jungle. Despite the lack of need for autopsies, Dr. C. Leslie Mootoo, the top Guyanese pathologist, was at Jonestown hours after the deaths, and, refusing the assistance of U.S. pathologists, accompanied the teams that examined the bodies. His conclusions? Dr. Mootoo found fresh needle marks at the back of the left shoulder blades on 80 to 90 percent of the victims. Others had been shot or strangled. A surviving witness stated that those who resisted were forced by armed guards to comply. Dr. Mootoo's opinion, and that of the Guyanese grand jury investigating Jonestown, was that all but three (only two of which were suicides) were murdered by "persons unknown."
If one was to go over the deaths in Auschwitz, it is almost a certainty, considering the horrendous conditions those who were there were under, that 0.2 % of all deaths could be attributed to suicides. Yet if anyone was to argue that Auschwitz was a suicide camp housing a bunch of religious freaks and not the compounds of murder that they were, they would (rightfully) be condemned for intellectual dishonesty, and their motives would be questioned.The suicide hoax is merely the beginning of the deception. The original death count was 408 (an odd number to use if the number was an estimate), with the added claim that 700 had fled into the jungle. The final total was changed to 913. To explain this rather minor difference in arithmetic, American authorities first explained that those backward ignorant Guyanese "could not count." Perhaps because the first "official" explanation of the bad math was so insulting, it was then proposed that they missed a pile of bodies, as if a pile of dead bodies is something that is easily overlooked. Finally, the official explanation that settled the whole question was presented: Bodies were stacked on top of each other.
http://nstarzone.com/1978jonestown1.jpg
Of the 150 photos taken of the massacre, not one shows any body lying under any others. Those who first worked on the bodies, to release the gasses of decay, had to puncture the dead, making it unlikely that they missed anyone. These facts aside, one must wonder how 408 bodies -- 82 belonging to children -- could cover 505 others. Talk about bad math. With minor exceptions, pictures show the dead were found in neat rows, face down. The pictures also show drag marks leading to the bodies, indicating that victims were murdered elsewhere and placed there by someone else. These facts have lead to a more likely conclusion: 408 was indeed the correct original body count. The other 505 were hunted down and slaughtered, then dragged back. But who would do such a thing, and why? Furthermore, why were American officials giving such deceptive answers about Jonestown? To answer these questions, one must unravel the mystery of a man named Jim Jones. Jones became a Bible-thumping "faith healer," using wet chicken livers as evidence of cancer which he removed by "divine powers." He adopted eight children, some black, some white. Already the stench of criminal activity surrounded him, and his landlady referred to him as "a gangster who used the Bible instead of a gun." Fortunately for Jones, the local police chief at the time was Dan Mitrione, a friend from childhood. Mitrione kept him from being arrested or run out of town. Mitrione would later enter the International Police Academy, a CIA front for training counterinsurgency and torture techniques.
Despite having few sources for known funds, Jones found enough money to travel with his wife and family to Brazil in 1961. Coincidentally, Mitrione was there as well, having advanced quickly in the IPA. Mitrione had honed his skills at torture and assassination by practicing on kidnapped beggars. He himself was later kidnapped and murdered by guerrillas in Uruguay, an incident which became the basis of the Costa Gavras film State of Siege. Jones made regular trips to Belo Horizonte, site of CIA headquarters in Brazil -- and Mitrione's town of residence. Apparently, this wasn't the only curious intelligence link to Jones. He told some of his neighbors that he was involved in the U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence. The U.S. embassy provided Jones with transportation, groceries, and a large home. Considering his dear friendship to Mitrione and the funding of "ministries" in Latin America by the CIA, the theory that Jones was a U.S. intelligence asset makes quite a bit of sense. In any case, according to his neighbor, Jones "lived like a rich man."Soon after the JFK assassination, Jones returned to the states with $10,000. In 1965, he formed the first People's Temple in Ukiah, California, and set up Happy Havens Rest Home.
Without trained personnel or proper licensing, Jones' camp drew in prisoners, the elderly, people from mental institutions, and 150 foster children, many of whom were transferred by court order. Among those who contacted him: "missionaries" from World Vision (an international evangelical order that often fronts for the CIA); the local chapter head to the John Birch Society; and leaders of the Republican party, for whom his "church" members conducted voter organization and fund-raising activities for the Dick Nixon '68 campaign. Jones' advisors included a mercenary from UNITA, the CIA-backed Angola army. Also jumping on board was the Layton family, whose patriarch, U.C.-Berkeley chemist Dr. Laurence Laird Layton, had worked on the Manhattan Project. Dr. Layton was also chief of the Army's Chemical Warfare Division in the early 1950's. (Mrs. Layton was the daughter of Hugo Phillips, a German banker/stockbroker who became rich representing Siemans & Halske and I.G. Farben, two notorious Nazi Holocaust profiteers.) Despite his rather right-wing background, Jones suddenly declared himself a liberal socialist -- in fact, he called himself a dual reincarnation of both Jesus Christ and Lenin. At this point, a cloud of suspicion began to gather around his church, which was staffed by jack-booted armed thugs who dressed in black uniforms.
Jones took everything he could from his followers, much of it in the form of welfare and social security checks, using blackmail, extortions, and any other available means. The local press reported about seven mysterious deaths of those who attempted to leave the "church" due to conflicts with Jones. Accusations of kidnapping, beatings, and sexual abuse began to circulate. To escape controversy, Jones moved to San Francisco and became an important fundraiser for the Bay area political establishment. Soon, he was schmoozing with the liberal and radical elite, meeting with (among others) Rosalynn Carter and Angela Davis. Jones was rewarded by being put in charge of the city Housing Commission, and key followers were awarded jobs in the Welfare Department. The bulk of Jones' flock came from the unemployed and dispossessed people found there. The cult preyed on the poor and helpless, going out of its way to enlist women, children and minorities. Many members were recruited directly from San Francisco mental hospitals. However, the move to San Francisco did little to quiet the controversy surrounding his "church," and a 1977 expose put Jones on the defensive. He then moved his Utopia to Guyana, aided once again by the U.S. Embassy. After receiving complaints lodged by relatives of cult members, Congressman Leo Ryan visited Jonestown on November 18, 1978 to investigate allegations of human rights abuses. Congressman Ryan, a noted CIA critic, had authored the Hughes-Ryan Amendment, which would have required the CIA to disclose to Congress -- in advance -- details of all covert operations. The State department offered Ryan no answers or assistance, despite numerous inquiries. He arrived with U.S. embassy official Richard Dwyer, as well as some journalists. Among the reporters was Tim Reiterman, who had covered the Patty Hearst story for the San Francisco Examiner. In all likelihood, Ryan already suspected what was really going on at Jonestown. That was when all hell broke loose.
http://nstarzone.com/1978jonestown2.jpg
At the airstrip, Leo Ryan soon became the first congressman to die in the line of duty, along with four reporters. (The Hughes-Ryan Amendment was killed in Congress soon afterwards.) The assassins were described by witnesses as "glassy eyed," "mechanically-walking zombies," and "devoid of any emotion." Dwyer and Reiterman were also shot. Soon after that, the mass slaughter began. A plausible explanation for the events that unfolded is that Jim Jones (or someone else) ordered the murders after Ryan's unexpected visit threatened to expose what was happening. In the chaos that followed, a mass extermination was carried out. Just who were the zombie assassins? Well, besides the 913 dead, 167 survivors returned from the camp. All news reports concede that there were at least 1100 individuals at the camp (and most reports place the number at 1200.) Who are these 200 or more people unaccounted for? The survivors report that there was a special all-white group that was well-armed, well-treated and free to exit the compound. These guards were never accounted for by any news reports.
Perhaps it is these same guards (assuming the total population was 1200) whom a congressional aide was referring to in an Associated Press quote which stated, "There are 120 white, brainwashed assassins out from Jonestown awaiting the trigger word to pick up their hit." Of course, they may have had a little help. Over 300 U.S. Green Berets -- trained for CIA covert assassinations -- were in the area at the time. So were nearly 600 British Black Watch commandos, who were in Guyana conducting a "training exercise." Suddenly, the death toll seems relatively low. The killings didn't stop in Guyana. Nine days later, San Francisco Mayor George Moscone and Supervisor Harvey Milk were slain by Dan White, who was either a "disgruntled police agent" or someone who was "angry about gays." These explanations were supplied to explain his utterly irrational behavior during the killings; sure enough, he was described as being in a bizarre "zombie state." During White's trial, his lawyers came up with the inventive but deservedly mocked "Twinkie defense," in which they claimed he went insane during a sugar high induced by eating too many sweets. Moscone and Milk received substantial financial backing from Jim Jones during his stay by the Bay; afterwards they were both investigated in connection to missing funds from the People's Temple. That is, until a "lone gunman" took them out.
Michael Prokes, a Jones aide, held a press conference and stated that the CIA and FBI were withholding an audiotape of the massacre. He also stated that he was an FBI informant. Right after that, he went to the restroom... and never left. His death was proclaimed a "suicide." In Georgetown, several more Temple members were killed following the Guyana massacre. The man charged with the murders, Charles Beikman, was an early follower of Jones who had become an "adopted son." Beikman was also a Green Beret. Jeanne and Al Mills, who were writing a book on Jonestown, were bound and shot to death at their home. In Detroit another survivor was killed near his home, and yet another was involved in a mass murder of school children in Los Angeles. Ironically, the dead may not have included Jim Jones himself. The body alleged to be his didn't show his tattoos in the photographs. Fingerprints had to be checked twice, and his dental records were never looked at. He was known to use doubles. As the massacre unfolded, Jones can be heard on a tape recording yelling, "Get Dwyer out of here!" Richard Dwyer was later found at the airstrip, methodically washing his hands. In 1968, Dwyer was listed in the publication Who's Who in the CIA. When asked if the allegation was true, he replied, "No comment."
Of course, Dwyer wasn't the only link to the CIA in Guyana. Besides those previously mentioned, U.S. ambassador John Burke and another official named Richard McCoy were both heavily involved with the intelligence community. The U.S. embassy in Georgetown also housed the Georgetown CIA station. At the time, Guyana had a socialist government, and thus was a likely target for covert operations. Dan Webber, sent to Guyana after the massacre, was also with the CIA. The "official" attorney for the survivors, Joseph Blatchford, was involved in a scandal involving CIA infiltration of the Peace Corps. Then we have the missing money that just "disappeared" after the slaughter. Conservative estimates place the amount at $26 million. Others place it at $2 billion. At the time, a major international money laundering operation was headquartered in Italy, involving the Vatican and a fascist quasi-Masonic lodge known as the P-2, or Propaganda Duo. (This operation probably led to the murder of Pope John Paul I -- but that's another conspiracy.) The CIA-linked P-2 had a major operation located in Panama, not too far from Jonestown. Add in the FBI files on the Black Panthers and Weathermen found at the site, an attempt to lure Mark Lane (JFK assassination critic and James Earl Ray lawyer, among other things) and Donald Freed (Lane's sometime JFK collaborator and Simpson case investigator who linked the Brentwood murders to Mafia in the L.A. underworld) to Guyana (which succeeded in having Lane witness the airstrip murders after Jones hired him as a lawyer), and a bizarre plot to kidnap Grace Walden Stephens (a key Martin Luther King assassination witness) and smuggle her to Jonestown, and you have the makings of a full fledge spook operation.
One of the strangest CIA connections to Jonestown was the previously mentioned World Vision, an evangelical order which often fronts for the CIA. They performed espionage work for the CIA in Southeast Asia while Operation Phoenix (the murderous project that left 40,000 people dead) was in full effect. In Honduras, they maintained a presence at CIA contra recruiting camps in the war against the Sandinistas. In Lebanon, the fascist Phalange butchered Palestinians at World Vision's camp. In Cuba, their refugee camps hosted numerous members of the anti-Castro terrorist group Alpha 66 of Bay of Pigs fame. After the Guyana massacre, World Vision developed a scheme to repopulate Jonestown with CIA-linked mercenaries from Laos. Laos, of course, was where the CIA was running it's "secret war" during Vietnam, which for the most part was a smokescreen for a widespread opium trafficking operation. One particularly important World Vision official was John Hinckley, Sr., an oil man, reputed CIA officer, and friend of George Bush. You may have heard of his son. Less than four months before Hinckley Jr. became known as Jodie Foster's biggest fan, another member of the World Vision order, Mark Chapman, gunned down John Lennon in what may have been a practice run for the bigger hit on President Reagan. One of the policemen who found him was convinced that he was a mind-controlled assassin. Chapman was clutching a copy of the novel Catcher in the Rye, which was also owned by John Hinckley Jr. (The book was written by J.D. Salinger, who worked in military intelligence with Henry Kissinger during World War II.) Before going to trial, Chapman plead guilty after a voice in his head (which he attributed it to God) commanded him to do so.
Considering the history of World Vision and what went on previously in Guyana, it is possible that the real purpose behind repopulating Jonestown was to create another breeding ground for brainwashed zombies like Chapman and Hinckley. Nearby Jonestown there was a place called Hilltown, a compound of 8,000 blacks that followed cult leader Rabbi David Hill, who held his flock with an iron fist. Hill had so much power that he was referred to as the "vice prime minister" of Guyana. There was also another place in Guyana called "Johnstown," as well as similar operations in the Phillipines and Chile. It appears that Jonestown (and World Vision's later attempt) is hardly the exception to the rule of using obscure locations in Third World nations as laboratories for covert cult operations. The Jonestown site in Guyana was originally a Union Carbide mine, and was loaded with an abundance of precious natural resources. It is very likely that the site was chosen to exploit these resources with cheap labor -- and cheap labor was plentiful.
Members of Jim Jones' "church" were bound and gagged immediately after landing in Guyana and taken to the compound. They were pumped with drugs, which were available in vast amounts at Jonestown -- enough to drug 200,000 people for more than a year. Among the drugs found there: Quaaludes, Valium, morphine, Demerol, Thorazine (a dangerous tranquilizer), sodium pentathol (a truth serum), chloral hydrate (a hypnotic chemical agent), thallium (which confuses thinking), and, of course, cyanide. Jonestown residents lived in cramped quarters and ate meager rations of often spoiled food. They were then forced to give 16 to 18 hours of slave labor per day. When they weren't working, they were required to stay up day and night listening to Jim Jones lecture. Among the charming punishments the flock endured were forced druggings, sensory deprivation in an underground box, physical torture, and public sexual rape and humiliation, not to mention your average ordinary beatings and verbal abuse. All of the drugs and environmental conditions forced upon Jonestown residents were also employed in the CIA's notorious MKULTRA program, which was implemented to test and implement brainwashing and mind control techniques. A 1974 government report admitted that certain "target populations" were used, namely blacks, women, prisoners, the elderly, children, and inmates of psychiatric wards. The Center for the Study and Reduction of Violence, using the research of Strangelovian doctors Jose Delgado and Louis "Jolly" West, drew guinea pigs from the "target populations" to test drugs, implants, and psychosurgery techniques at an isolated military missile base in California. The dead at Jonestown were 90% women, 80% black, and included 276 children.
http://nstarzone.com/jonestown2.jpg
WHEN THE BODIES WERE SHIPPED BACK TO AMERICA, THERE WERE NO AUTOPSIES DONE, THEY WERE BURIED, AND THE FAMILIES WERE NOT ALLOWED TO SEE THEM
Which leads us back to Auschwitz and the ultimate deja vu. Auschwitz, after all, was not just a death camp: It was also a slave labor camp for Nazi military-industrial monolith I.G. Farben. There, the outcasts and refuse of society who no one cared about faced similar abuses, while an elite few profited from their misery. The brains behind the Final Solution became the brains behind MKULTRA. The MK is often said to stand for "Mind Kontrol" -- representing the Germanic origins of the project. Going the full ten yards, however, it is possible that MK merely stands for "Mein Kampf". Congressman Ryan probably suspected that Jonestown was a front for sinister covert activity. In 1980, Ryan aide Joseph Holsinger received a paper entitled "The Penal Colony," which explained that CIA MKULTRA operations did not terminate in 1973, as officially proclaimed, but instead continued in public hospitals, prisons, and religious cults which were used as fronts. Holsinger later stated at a San Francisco psychology forum on Jonestown that he believed the CIA worked with Jones to perform medical and mind control experiments at People's Temple. If Congressman Ryan had not been killed -- a big if -- many skeletons in the CIA's closet may have been exposed.
Michael Meiers, author of "Was Jonestown a CIA Medical Experiment?" had this to say: "The Jonestown experiment was conceived by Dr. Layton, staffed by Dr. Layton and financed by Dr. Layton. It was as much his project as it was Jim Jones's." Layton, remember, was head of the Army's Chemical Warfare Division. Former Temple member Joyce Shaw wondered if Jonestown was "some kind of horrible government experiment, or some sort of sick, racist thing... a plan like that of the Germans, to exterminate blacks." In October 1981, Jonestown survivors filed a $63 million lawsuit against Jonestown-era Secretary of State Cyrus Vance and CIA director Stansfield Turner. The suit stated that the State Department and CIA conspired to "enhance the economic and political powers of James Warren Jones," conducting "mind control and drug experimentation" there. The suit was dismissed four months later for "failure to prosecute timely," and all requests for appeal were denied. (Turner would become a director of Monsanto, now best known for providing the world with the brain-damaging, cancer causing poison bearing the innocuous moniker "NutraSweet".)
All this, of course, is forgotten in official accounts of the events at Jonestown. Instead, the more palatable -- but less accurate -- version of the Jonestown story blames the victims, echoing the ignorant grunt uttered by Pete Hamill, who dismissed the dead as "all the loose change of the sixties."Hanging over Jonestown was a mocking sign that proclaimed, "THOSE WHO DO NOT REMEMBER THE PAST ARE CONDEMNED TO REPEAT IT." One of the most elegant slogans of Holocaust survivors is "Never forget." Jonestown makes it clear that, no matter how well meaning, all these slogans are but words. Never forget? We obviously already have. That Jonestown could unfold before our eyes without the realization of precisely what was going on says volumes. Certainly the blame falls partly at the feet of a powerful military-industrial complex that feels no shame for its deeds, and certainly partly at a Korporate Media that has become the witting mouthpiece (and collaborator) for this same cabal.

But ultimately, the blame falls at the feet of the people, their brains dulled by sitcoms and soap operas, their reality gradually drawn within the boundaries of the cathode ray tube. By the time the Guyana massacre rolled around, the masses were too ignorant and apathetic to know or care about the truth. Instead, they swallowed the official version and waited obediently for the next big lie. What's worse, the truth itself has become untenable. Instead of outrage and calls for justice, attacks are most often leveled at those who openly question the official account of the Jonestown massacre, or OTHER government/media coverups. Witness the treatment of people trying to expose the lies and coverups surrounding 9-11. Or try bringing the 9-11 coverup, Jonestown, or any of the other hundreds of covert government operations up in polite company and see the kind of response you get. Could the Holocaust happen again? It already has, and will continue to happen. One wonders if it ever really ended.
Robert Sterling - R.J.E.















Bottom of Form
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
Followers
Blog Archive
·                     ▼  2016 (47)
o                                            ▼  November (6)
§                                                                     ALL MY LIFE I HAVE SPENT THINKING OF HOW TO HALT R...
§                                                                     DR KENEZ HAS FOUND OUT THE THIRD EYE OUR ANCESTOR ...
§                                                                     RELIGIOUS FANATICISM RESULTS WHEN A STRONG WILL PA...
§                                                                     RELIGIOUS FANATICISM NEEDS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A D...
§                                                                     POLITICAL FANATICISM AND RELIGIOUS FANATICISM ARE ...
§                                                                     RELIGIOUS FANATICISM versus POLITICAL FANATICISM A...
o                                            ►  October (12)
o                                            ►  September (18)
o                                            ►  July (1)
o                                            ►  May (1)
o                                            ►  March (6)
o                                            ►  February (1)
o                                            ►  January (2)
·                     ►  2015 (21)
·                     ►  2014 (14)
·                     ►  2013 (13)
·                     ►  2011 (2)
About Me
My photo
As a doctor and a theosphist I am available to all shades of human beings at my websites, e-mails and clinic located at C82, Federal Housing Estates, Trans-Ekulu, Enugu or during the summers; at Ezeawara town in Ihiala LGA of Anambra State if I am not on holidays to Houston-Texas, USA. ENGLISH Greetings to Rational Beings of this computer age! By having a website you are now recognised and respected as a Citizen of the Global Village. You are no more a racist, a chauvinist nor a parochial religionist. You are a special son or daughter of the Almighty Creator who has given us the macrocosms and microcosms to share. Let us live in peace like we ought to, equal heirs to the benefits we derive from being HOMO SAPIENS! Please visit http//www.happyfamilynetwork.hpage.com for the scientific creed and international educational guidelines and youth rearing practices that can make us ONE HUMAN FAMILY living in ONE CREATED UNIVERSE as children of ONE ALMIGHTY CREATOR.   FRENCH Salutations à des êtres rationnels de cette ère de l'informatique! En ayant un site web vous sont désormais reconnus et respectés en tant que citoyen du village global. Vous n'êtes pas plus raciste,chauvine, ni une un religieux paroissial. Vous êtes un fils ou une fillespéciale du Créateur Tout-Puissant qui nous a donné le macrocosme et le microcosme de partager. Laissez-nous vivre en paix comme nous devrions, héritiers égal aux avantages que nous tirons de se HOMO SAPIENS! S'il vous plaît visitez http / /www.happyfamilynetwork.hpage.com pour la croyance scientifique et directives internationales et les pratiques éducatives des jeunesd'élevage qui peuvent nous faire une famille vivant humain dans ununivers créé que les enfants d'un Créateur Tout-Puissant.   GERMAN Grüße an Rational Wesen dieser Computer-Zeitalter! Durch eineWebsite, die Sie jetzt anerkannt und respektiert als Citizen of theGlobal Village. Sie sind nicht mehr ein Rassist, ein Chauvinist noch eine engstirnige Glaubensgenossen. Sie sind eine spezielle Sohn oder die Tochter des allmächtigen Schöpfers, der uns gegeben hat,der Makrokosmos und Mikrokosmos zu teilen. Lasst uns in Friedenleben wie wir sollten, gleich Erben, um die Vorteile wir aus Homosapiens! Bitte besuchen Sie http / /www.happyfamilynetwork.hpage.com für die wissenschaftlicheCredo und internationalen Bildungs-Richtlinien und JugendErziehungsmethoden, die uns eine menschliche Familie lebt in ONEgeschaffene Universum als Kinder eines allmächtigen Schöpferskann.   SPANISH Saludos a los seres racionales de esta era de la informática! Al tener un sitio web que está ahora reconocida y respetada como un ciudadano de la Aldea Global. Tú no eres más racista, chovinista, niun religioso parroquial. Usted es un hijo o una hija especial del Creador Todopoderoso, que nos ha dado el macrocosmos y elmicrocosmos de compartir. Vivamos en paz, como debemos,herederos igual a los beneficios que se derivan de ser homo sapiens! Por favor, visite http / /www.happyfamilynetwork.hpage.com para el credo científico ydirectrices internacionales y las prácticas educativas de jóvenes de crianza que nos puede hacer vivir UNA FAMILIA HUMANA en un universo creado como hijos del Creador Todopoderoso. 

Religion, which is superstition sanctioned by the state, is actually an addiction to man-made doctrines and dogmas invented, patented and copyrighted by a few demagogues.
• It enslaves the mind more than psychoactive drugs,
• Benumbs human creativity and resourcefulness thereby
• Restricting the development of the human potential and capital.
It is the main cause of poverty of the mind and underdevelopment of third world countries as its side-effects are indolence, redundancy, laziness and dependence of finished products and services. In the final analysis, it is the predisposing factor to lack of initiative, debilitating ignorance, fetish belief-systems, abject poverty and perennial ill-health.

Perhaps its only advantage is that it makes the polity docile and amenable to the whims and caprices of their oppressive leaders. Often, it hoodwinks its adherents into believing that ‘The God’ or ‘the gods’ they worship speak to them through the voices of their egocentric clerics who therefore can conveniently exploit them to satisfy their demonic desires of sensual pleasure and inordinate ambitions of amassing wealth. Their wanton indulgence in gluttony, wine and women is seen in every action and definitely this is the foolproof evidence of their demonic genealogy.

To rescue humanity from the demonic stranglehold of idolatry that now predominates worldwide, you are invited to reason along with us and see that we provide an everlasting cure for sensual lust for food, wine, sex, wealth and power that are the trademarks of society heading for damnation! Are you going to sit on the fence and wait for another failed experiment in Messiahship that was riddled with myopic and ethnocentric bias? Who knows the Creator well enough to declare that he has ‘a chosen people’? Where is the evidence that Moses actually led the so-called people out of any oppressive regime? The history books and modern encyclopaedia did not record the enslavement of the Jewish race except as ‘they were believed as revealed truths’. 



The Creator has hidden so much from our intellectual faculties that to date we are still unravelling those He is allowing humanity to glimpse at through divine dreams, intuitions, inspirations and revelations to devout souls! Do you want to have supernatural knowledge mediated by spiritual faculties of seeing, feeling, sensing and caring for others? Look inwards, for the kingdom of God is inside you, not outside as many preachers tell you. No one ever got eternal bliss by keeping the commandments of men. It is given to altruistic seekers of that Divine Guidance in the affairs of mankind, which many yearn for but do not know where, when and how to find it. Search for it in this book!

The creator gave humans some of his powers and knowledge for recreating the material universe for the mutual benefits of all his created beings but today many use his gifts to perpetrate evil. Either by design or demonic manipulation, the obverse is the case; the first datum that every living thing recognises is that someone put it here and caters for its welfare. Dogs respect and fight in defence of their owners. Every pet realises that it is loved and taken care of by someone who has value for its existence. It is human who pride themselves of being rational beings that do not recognise, respect or realise that all of us have a single owner. It is absurd! Some believe there is an Almighty Creator who provides for each creature on daily basis, some assert that he has turned his back on us due to our congenital wickedness and cruel ways, while others simply deny his existence!

This is my summation of the problem; “Religion was/is a superstitious search by humanity for its origin, existence, meaning and relevance before the scientific era. The search was led by acclaimed sages among the elders of a community who defined its theories and practices. It is later ratified and recommended for legislation and implementation by state apparatus by convincing stratagem or coercion by politico-religious leaders. Thereafter, it is fine tuned and administered by ordained priests and priestesses who hand it down along ancestral lineages from one generation of lukewarm adherents, fanatics and mystics to another. Gradually, strong personalities emerge claiming divine appointment and so pull strong followers who idolise them as role models with supernatural powers. This obsession confirms them as beacons of adulation and finally leads to full scale idolatry. 

INTRODUCTION TO INTEGRATIONAL SPIRITAN MOVEMENT
The Computer-Age Spiritual Fellowship for Citizens of Our Global Village

Many people are mere conformists. They are those personalities that are satisfied with ‘going through the motions’; doing what everyone else is doing to make a living and waiting for the final ‘call to glory’ as they brand death! Many of us are born and live an inconsequential life; bland, uneventful and without anything particular to be remembered for after our exit from this mundane world, a temporal habitation for the soul. There are some others, whose lives and contributions to the society made a difference! They changed the ‘status quo’ by either extending the frontiers of knowledge or developing their immediate communities. They improved the understanding of human nature and taught others the values of humanitarianism. These heroes and heroines touched the lives of many both inter-racially and internationally.

They added colour to the doldrums of routine existence on planet earth!
A few had tall dreams and went ahead to transform them into reality despite all odds. This group devised methods of changing the deplorable situations and the deprived circumstances of the lifestyle they met on becoming adults. Some adolescents dream of the courage to better their social status, but often take off on the wrong foot of seeking for titles, money, fame and crowning it all with indulging in romantic relationships.

Others dared to pursue the unknown, to break new grounds and blaze trails for followers to tread on. Their zeal, inquisitiveness, passion, persistence, desire, motivations and prayers were fully rewarded if they paid the prize for success; optimism, dedication and the refusal to quit. Their philosophy of life was ‘When the task gets tough, the tough get it going!’, ‘Never say, never again!’ or ‘All that it takes to make the impossible possible is the power to remove the ‘im’ in front of the possible!’

They eventually became geniuses, inventors, explorers, leaders or discoverers! They evolved into the innovators and pioneers who helped to enlarge the frontiers of human civilisations and removed the age-old boundaries of the unknown. Joining this select group of animators or league of achievers is usually not by accident or by mere wishful thinking. Beyond desire and hard work is a divine factor that must be recognised, respected and appropriated in unveiling the unknown that the Divine Architect had hidden there for ages waiting for a brave soul to convert it from obscure dormancy to utilitarian vibrancy. This author, Dr Kenez wants to know where you belong in this universal continuum. Or, are you waiting for ‘manna from heaven’?

AGUNABU UMUELECHI BIAFRA 


Simple template. Powered by Blogger.


WE ARE STILL AT THE PRELIMINARY STAGES OF PLANNING HOW TO FULLY LIBERATE ALL MANIKIND IN GENERAL, AND BLACK AFRICANS ACROSS THE GLOBE, IN PARTICULAR,  *************  PROFESSOR JIDEOFO KENECHUKWU DANMBAEZUE CATEGORICALL STATES “HINC ET NUNC” THAT  RELIGIO-POLITICAL-MENTAL SLAVERY IS MORE ENDEMIC AND RETROGRESSIVE THAN SIMPLE PHYSICAL SLAVERY!

https://www.google.com.ng/search?q=DANMBAEZUE&sa=N&biw=1024&bih=470&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&ved=0ahUKEwiC-52S6qPRAhUrCsAKHReADEgQsAQINg#imgrc=RW5ob3FIZP85tM%3A

2 comments:

  1. I HOPE YOU SAW THE OMMISSION OF " Y " IN CATEGORICALLY


    IT IS PART OF BEING HUMAN!


    WE ARE STILL AT THE PRELIMINARY STAGES OF PLANNING HOW TO FULLY LIBERATE ALL MANIKIND IN GENERAL, AND BLACK AFRICANS ACROSS THE GLOBE, IN PARTICULAR, ************* PROFESSOR JIDEOFO KENECHUKWU DANMBAEZUE CATEGORICALL STATES “HINC ET NUNC” THAT RELIGIO-POLITICAL-MENTAL SLAVERY IS MORE ENDEMIC AND RETROGRESSIVE THAN SIMPLE PHYSICAL SLAVERY!

    WE SHALL OVERCOME SOMEDAY .... SOMEHOW ..... AND SOME TIME......

    ReplyDelete
  2. EPILOGUE ON AMERICAN APPLICATION OF THE ABOLITION OF SLAVE TRADE
    The USA abolished slavery only after its Civil War (aka ‘War between the States’) in 1865, although it is an over-simplification to attribute this war to slavery alone. Here it was a case of being slow to realize the implications of the Declaration of Independence which declared:
    ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.’

    This is mainly because right at the start, many of the states were Slave States. All the same, as Carroll and Shiflett point out in Christianity on Trial, this deduction from Paul’s statement in Galatians 3:28 (above) would have been laughed at in pagan times. It was this declaration that led Lincoln to abolish slavery, citing it in the Gettysburg Address.
    However, American slavers likewise realized the contradiction between slavery and the Declaration, so some of them invented schemes by which the black slaves were regarded as less than human. So in reality, it was more a case of slavery causing racism rather than racism causing slavery.

    In 1857, the US Supreme Court, under Roger Brooke Taney (1777–1864) ruled in the ‘Dred Scott decision’ that Congress could not outlaw slavery in any territory—this was to be the territory’s ‘right’ after it had become a state. Also, slaves were defined as non-persons, and their descendants could not become citizens.
    Later, this was rescinded, but it severely dented the moral authority of the Supreme court. And they haven’t learned either. In 1973, in Roe v. Wade, activist judges led by Harry Blackmun (who ironically had a cameo in Amistad) invented a ‘right to privacy’ supposedly found in the US Constitution, applied this to a woman’s womb, and decided that she has a right to abort her baby for any reason (which must logically include the reason, ‘We don’t want a girl’). In the process, the Court explicitly declared the unborn baby a non-citizen. I am convinced that one day, posterity will look upon Roe v. Wade with as much revulsion as the Dred Scott decision.

    ALL THE PROJENNY OF CHARLES DARWIN ARE DESCENDANTS OF APES. ANALYTICALLY COMPARE THEIR FACES AND ARRIVE AT THE SAME CONCLUSION!
    Dr Jideofo Kenechukwu Danmbaezue (2011)

    ReplyDelete